About damn time.
http://games.slashdot.org/games/04/1....shtml?tid=159
About damn time.
http://games.slashdot.org/games/04/1....shtml?tid=159
That's good!!!!
They won? What a quick case. I thought it was only just reported that they had filed a suit last week. I would have expected the case to drag on for a year.
No it's not! Well I guess it is good for Nintendo, but not for the following people:Originally Posted by NintendoMan
Collectors. I know some of us collectors enjoy owning weird pirated goods such as these controllers. This just makes it even harder to find such goods in my area. Some day I really do need to take a trip down to Brazil or over to Europe.
Gamers. The majority of the people who bought these clones (from what I have seen) were young adults (20s mostly) who wanted to relive their childhood memories. They had gotten rid of their NES consoles years ago, or it stopped working, and this was a quick and easy fix to playing the games. Much better feeling then playing the games on an emulator.
From a legal stand point, I can see why people would be glad that the piraters were stopped. However, it just forces people to buy over-priced GBA remakes of select NES games, if they want to play the games without digging out the old gray box. Go on Nintendo, make another freaking port of Super Mario Bros. or Mario Bros. We all want it, although we have the last six remakes of the game. Why don't you release some other games, less known (but well liked) titles. Ugh, I just don't like it.
The thing about these "Famiclones" is that they SUCK! I played one of those N64 lookalikes, and Super Mario Bros ran at like twice the normal speed. And you could not rotate the blocks in Tetris.
I see a few of your points, TRM - but obviously these were different to the devices being sold at my mall. Actually, I know they were identical - but I say that because I cannot see how these things could do any of the above. These things were overpriced - often around $100+ many of them - from threads and my own observations - were played via N64 style controllers, defeating the entire point about it being authentic and nostalgic.Gamers. The majority of the people who bought these clones (from what I have seen) were young adults (20s mostly) who wanted to relive their childhood memories. They had gotten rid of their NES consoles years ago, or it stopped working, and this was a quick and easy fix to playing the games. Much better feeling then playing the games on an emulator.
Now I do admit they were quick and easy - they involved two steps, buy and play - but overall, I just think they were more damaging than good. People can buy a Dreamcast and a disc of EVERY NES game released for about $19.99... and to be honest, it doesn't take any more effort than buying one of those bastardized machines. And while we're talking about prices - for the same price as one of those machines it would be possible to get a real NES and at least two dozen games. That is reliving your childhood - with a real controller, and having to blow into the carts (destroying them even more), to get them to work.
I'm as frustrated with Nintendo and it's belief that selling a 20 year old game for as many dollars is "rewarding its customers" - I think they've milked their franchises more than even Capcom, a feat I never thought I'd see eclipsed, but the fact remains they are their franchises to milk. If those people want to create those systems and cheat the system - more power to them - but keep it underground. I'm all for hyping emulation and classic gaming - but cases like this are just bad news.
As for it making it harder for collectors - I think it has just made it as difficult as before. Typically these things were found and sold on the net - and they'll still be there. They're just not in malls any more, and I think that is great. Imagine if these things caught on and generations of future gamers grew up thinking that - that - thing actually represented Nintendo's NES?
The ones at my mall were around $50 a pop. 10% off if you bought two of them. Whether playing it with a Nintendo 64-style controller or not, I still think playing it on a TV is more authentic then playing it on a computer screen. Especially when you had the gun and everything. A nice package deal if you ask me.Originally Posted by pixelsnpolygons
I do see your points on not wanting gamers to think that "that - thing" represented Nintendo's NES. However, I don't see this as being any worse then playing NES games on an emulator, or on a Gameboy Advance via single (expensive) cartridges, or with a flash cart. None of them are the same as the real thing, but some can simulate it better than others.
I love reading the game listings and see games we know and love with messed up naming like "Mario Pipe" and the like.
My Gaming Collection (Now at Google Drive!)
This doesn't affect anything but what's sold for Retail in the U.S.
You can still import the things and but them from overseas Ebay Sellers.
Just because a law or ruling is passed in the U.S. doesn't mean it affects the rest of the world.
My guess is, the defendents didn't show up, and/or a judge ruled without hearing a case.Originally Posted by pixelsnpolygons
Well The Big "N" is trying to stop that too .Originally Posted by TRM
Yeah, I'm happy they're being seized and banned. I can't wait for them to ban em here in Canada...I hate those damned things. Absolute trash and insanely overpriced. Some guy in a mall here was selling a 77,000 in 1 N64 style one in a mall booth the other day and tried to sell me one. I laughed at him and told him that was a lot of illegal copyright infringement to be peddling. He argued with me that "if it was illegal, they wouldn't let him sell it". He insisted it must be legal or the police would have come and closed his booth. I hope he and ALL others like him get shut down.
scooterb: "I once shot a man in Catan, just to watch him die."
I had an arguement over the legality of them with a guy once... I ended up walking away with one for only 18 bucks
Seriously, though, they are good for some quick fun but don't match the real thing at all. Why would anyone pay 50 bucks for one of these?
Still a gamer, still a liberal.
So much for that argument!Originally Posted by briguy578
Well, I hate the idea that the things are out there, but I also hate that Nintendo hasn't released any updated versions of the system themselves...though I hear from lots of people here that dropping support for old games is a good thing I disagree.
Yea, This is awsome news! I was at the flea market once and some guy was going to buy a gamecube for his son, but the guy selling famiclones convinced him that a famiclone was a better buy because its the price of one new cube game. I feel bad to this day I didn't say something, that poor kid got a famiclone for his bday or christmas. :/
I am so sick of kids being ripped off cause of these things. there is like 5 vendors that sell them in the mall now.
Somebody make me a "CGE 2k7 Attendee banner" so I don't have to use this lame text
Well I wonder how they are gonna "Catch'em All!" FAMI-CLONES! ^_^ kekeke
I say this, because Texas is the worst for illegal crap like this.
Still, congratulations to Nintendo for waking up! Now that Nintendo is awake, how about some better 3rd party support for Cube??..what's that Nintendo? you say no?...oh well... I tried...
These cartridges are dirty as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!
Well the price difference does make a slight change in my opinion on the systems. I agree wholeheartedly on the TV thing - though the Dreamcast emulation would have allowed that too. To be honest, I think their machines, while poorly executed and designed, were a great idea and one that I am surprised/disappointed that Nintendo hasn't adopted. If Nintendo released a unit for $50 with a couple dozen of their biggest games it would be one of the hottest holiday sales items.The ones at my mall were around $50 a pop. 10% off if you bought two of them. Whether playing it with a Nintendo 64-style controller or not, I still think playing it on a TV is more authentic then playing it on a computer screen. Especially when you had the gun and everything. A nice package deal if you ask me.
Nintendo claims they lost how much due to these machines? I recall it being in the hundreds of millions. Why they can't make the connection, I don't know. But I simply hate them [the Famiclone Co.'s] for having the audacity to take a pieces of software that, obviously, still generate millions for Nintendo and just run with it. And it is funny because I don't object to the practice, I just object to the practice in the mall environment. Funny double standard of sorts - but the part that bothers me is really just that they took their product to a place that illigitimate products typically don't belong. If this was a Lik Sang item - I'd probably be somewhat interested.
True, true. In other words, we both agree that there's no substitute for the real thing. Hopefully one day Nintendo will release an official product such as those machines - though better. I suspect it will try to port its SNES and N64 games to the DS, first - however. I won't be buying those either.I do see your points on not wanting gamers to think that "that - thing" represented Nintendo's NES. However, I don't see this as being any worse then playing NES games on an emulator, or on a Gameboy Advance via single (expensive) cartridges, or with a flash cart. None of them are the same as the real thing, but some can simulate it better than others.
Here we go again...look, Nintendo makes more money selling games seperately. I'd appreciate it if they sold a new edition Famicom, but one with games built-in? Not gonna happen (they'd also piss off many of the FC 20th anniversary/NES Classics adopters too).Originally Posted by pixelsnpolygons
Whoa, slow down - we're not going anywhere again. I know how Nintendo makes its millions, and I know it isn't buy lumping all of its successful games into a piece of finely melded plastic and slapping an attractive price tag on the outside. I know that is not going to happen - I simply said it would be nice if it did, from a consumer stand point. I don’t have shares in Nintendo, and I can’t see how my idea is any more eccentric than their own kamikaze business strategies. And I honestly couldn't care less about the FC 20th anniversary/NES Classics adopters - because they're the idiots feeding Nintendo with that crazy notion that it is still 1989. I wish those games fell flat on their face - but that is a rant for another day.Here we go again...look, Nintendo makes more money selling games seperately. I'd appreciate it if they sold a new edition Famicom, but one with games built-in? Not gonna happen (they'd also piss off many of the FC 20th anniversary/NES Classics adopters too).
In a nutshell - I'd never realistically expect Nintendo to just give away its livelihood - which at this point is games it made at earliest 10 years before present time. But such a product would be nice, and it would, still do well. In the meantime, I'll let those FC 10th/NC fans can go crazy over the re-releases, and then do it again for the DS, and Revolution... so on and so on and so on. Nintendo won’t be getting my cash, so I don’t really care.
And I said why it wouldn't be nice, from the standpoint of their loyal consumers xDOriginally Posted by pixelsnpolygons