I played FF3-NES for First time! Didn't like it. :-(

[musical]

Sadly. It was not hard, but it was boooooring. The story is not the least bit interesting (and quite sparse). I might play the 16-bit version of FF1-NES and FF2-NES (aka FF Origins), but I have my doubts. FF3-NES was such a lousy/disappointing experience.



In contrast, FF5-Super Nintendo and FF6-Super Nintendo were fantastic. I hear many say FF5 had a lousy story, but it worked for me.

[AMG]

I hear many say FF5 had a lousy story, but it worked for me.

I enjoyed FFV more than FFVI also.

I did enjoy FFVI though.

[Azazel]

Well other than the first one all Final Fantasy games are pretty easy. 2 is kind of hard but that's cause of how bad the gameplay is. I think for it's time FF3 was pretty good. I also enjoyed part 5 and didn't have any huge problems with the story.

[musical]

The game was okay. I jst wanted more story and a better plot.

[kainemaxwell]

FF2 I liked the story but still hate the battle system, which is what turne dme off to it. FF3 I do like though- it really start sout the whole multiple type worlds feel and begins alot of instituons in future FF games, mainly the first Cid and multiple airships.

[ubersaurus]

All the NES final fantasy's were kinda weak. Kinda really weak. It's amazing they took off and Dragon Warrior didn't, because DW's series was far superior on the NES.

[kainemaxwell]

Actually to me the FF storylines really took off with FF4's epic. before then most them were x warriors saving y world and complete z miniquests along the way. FF2 for the NES had the most story of the NES trilogy to me and I think FF3 was a good springboard for FF4's epic (along with introducing all those fun classes for FF5).