PDA

View Full Version : Gamespot changes review system, adds 'medals'



7th lutz
06-24-2007, 02:54 PM
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/06/24/gamespot-changes-review-system-adds-medals/

Gamespot editorial director Jeff Gerstmann has announced that next week the website will be changing its review system. Starting next week, the self-described formulaic score will be replaced with a 19-point scale -- "that's 1.0 to 10.0 with half-step [0.5] increments," he said. In the absence of sub-scores for graphics, sound, audio, etc., the reviews will also add a medal system to award games for specific merits such as graphics (artistic or technical). There are reportedly 60 medals currently planned, with room for later expansion.

Gerstmann cited the evolution of the games industry as a reason for the new system. "The assumption [the previous system] makes is that graphics are just as important in a driving game as they are in a rhythm game. You shouldn't need me to tell you that they aren't," he said. Gerstmann also notes that the content of the review, unsurprisingly, is not going to change. The new system coincides with a Gamespaces redesign; a preview of the new look can be found here.

By merit of being one of the two biggest video game websites around (the other being IGN), Gamespot has dealt with its fair share of criticism regarding its reviews. (Remember the backlash when they gave Twilight Princess a meager 8.8?) With this marked change in the site's eleven-year review system, we're hoping the website will use this opportunity to shift the grade scale bell curve to 5.0 instead of 7.0, giving their higher scores more of an impact.

roushimsx
06-24-2007, 03:22 PM
we're hoping the website will use this opportunity to shift the grade scale bell curve to 5.0 instead of 7.0, giving their higher scores more of an impact.

Thank god. I hate seeing people overreact at 7.x and 8.x, assuming that the game is a massive disappointment and a piece of shit if it's anything less than a 9.x (and even then, it seems if a game is "only" a 9.0 or a 9.1 then it's not really that good).

I love the whole "let's just cut everything down to a 7 if it sucks and an 8 if it rocks" argument because it's so true.

Snapple
06-24-2007, 03:25 PM
Do I remember the Twilight Princess debacle? Hell, I took a screenshot of the TP board on GameFAQs. Hilarious.

http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s38/unclesnapple/tpyf5.jpg

And these people hadn't even played the game yet, so they had no idea how good it was. Yet, they were positive that "8.8 - Great" was an insult.

diskoboy
06-24-2007, 04:38 PM
In all honesty, I've never taken a gamespot review seriously.

djsquarewave
06-24-2007, 07:10 PM
In all honesty, I've never taken a video game review seriously.

Oobgarm
06-25-2007, 07:59 AM
In all seriously, I've never taken a gamespot video game review honestly.

I would much rather try the title and form my own opinion. Reviews can attempt to be unbiased, but enjoyment is a subjective thing. There's no two ways about it.

PDorr3
06-25-2007, 01:29 PM
After enjoying Shadowrun so much on 360 and after seeing every review was negative I dont think I will be so quick to base my purchases based on gamerankings.com overall scores anymore. Gamefly works wonders.

The people over at gamespot.com are furious over this change though, the news post has almost 1,800 comments. They will get used to it though, just like the gamefaqs redesign people were furious over that (I was one of them, not furious but it was a big change after visiting the site for many years) but over time things grow on people.