Video Game Survey: Only 11% Don't Mind Paying Full Retail

[The 1 2 P]

This survey was taken to help better understand the buying habits of gamers in our evergrowing fragile(even more than it already is) economy. What's interesting is that only 11% said they don't mind paying full retail($59.99) for new games upon their initial release. That can only mean two things: that 11% doesn't have any common sense and the other 89% are as broke as me. Here are the results: http://www.gamedaily.com/articles/news/consumers-still-hesitating-when-it-comes-to-5999-nextgen-pricing-ndash-magid-/?biz=1

Now before everyone tries to knock me out like my name is Chuck Lidell and your name is Rashad Evans, let me clarify my earlier statement. The 11% who buy at full retail doesn't mean they don't have common sense--it just means they most likely have more disposable income than the rest of us. And the other 89%(of which I am a part of)are not neccasarily broke(although I really am)--it just means we are more cautious of how we spend our money. I love getting the lastest and greatest just as much as the next guy/girl, but financially I am not on a level to do that yet. And besides, check out my forum thread for all the good deals you can get when you are patient: http://www.digitpress.com/forum/showthread.php?t=115238

[MrSparkle]

the only time i find myself paying retail or above prices are on games that have been out of the retail market for quite some time. I'm sure a few of us on here can say the same. If its current or last gen ill pick it up used. If its a few gens old well then your really limited to how/what you pay for the item. Am I the only one who finds himself saying. This is kind of expensive but i've always wanted it and if i dont get it now its only going to cost more in the future.

[megasdkirby]

Very nice article.

For me, I rather wait for a price drop. Not that I cannot afford it, I just can't justify paying $60 or so for a game, unless it is something I REALLY want.

Now if the game costs $30 or less, the probabilites are high that I will pick it up.

If not...I buy them used months later. I rather spend $60 on 6 games than on 1 game.

[MrSparkle]

In the last year i've purchased maybe one game at its retail release. Most games simply aren't worth the high retail price of admission to me. Not when i can enjoy the same game 6 months down the line for 1/10th the price. Besides i have a backlog of games to play through that would keep me busy for years to come so its not like i'm sitting on the edge of my seat waiting for the next mediocre console FPS to hit store shelves.

[TonyTheTiger]

The 11% who buy at full retail doesn't mean they don't have common sense--it just means they most likely have more disposable income than the rest of us. And the other 89%(of which I am a part of)are not neccasarily broke(although I really am)--it just means we are more cautious of how we spend our money.

Maybe. But it could be a volume thing. I actually used to buy more games new than I do now but I'm also buying more games in total. Some of that 11% might consist of people who buy maybe 3 games every 6 months.

[Nitrosport]

I only buy a new game if it's something I want to play really bad and I've been waiting for it to come out forever.

[Sabz5150]

It depends on the title/developer/publisher.

[The 1 2 P]

In the last year i've purchased maybe one game at its retail release. Most games simply aren't worth the high retail price of admission to me.

The last time I've purchased a game at full retail was Halo 2 way back in 2004and thats only because I had a $50 gift card to use toward my $5 preorderROFL. Yes I'm a cheap bastard, but like MrSparkle, Kirby and others have said---why pay full price for something you can get 6-8 months later for atleast half price?

I got my copy of Call of Duty 4(I still don't have a 360 yet....another 3 weeks to go) about a month ago for $20 during Best Buy's summer clearance sale. And when I get my 360(something else I waited on purchasing to save money) next month I'll be able to enjoy it just as much as the people who got it on day one:king:

[Rob2600]

Not all next-gen games debut at $59.99. Many great Wii games debut at $29.99 and $19.99. Do they count? If so, I buy plenty of games at full retail price.

[The 1 2 P]

Not all next-gen games debut at $59.99. Many great Wii games debut at $29.99 and $19.99. Do they count? If so, I buy plenty of games at full retail price.


I think the survey was based primarily around the $59.99 full retail price of new 360 and PS3 games.

[TonyTheTiger]

One part of the Wii that I'm loving. Octomania brand new for $9.99? I'm game. The last new game I bought was Blast Works for $19.99 minus $5 thanks to a discount coupon. These aren't exactly Mass Effect but it's nice to have that outlet for budget games. And, believe me when I say no way in hell would I have paid more than $15 for Octomania or more than $20 for Blast Works. I want to get Boom Blox but not for what it costs today. Of course, distinguishing the worthwhile budget games from the shovelware is a problem but that's a whole other can of worms.

[Rob2600]

I want to get Boom Blox but not for what it costs today.

I agree about Boom Blox. I'd buy it for $25...maybe even $30...but not $50.


distinguishing the worthwhile budget games from the shovelware is a problem

Not for people who visit web sites like Gamestats.com or Metacritic.com. :)

[Jackattack]

I, like probably most of you, decide if I want to buy the game at launch based on how much I want the game. Galaxy was an instant buy and I couldn't wait another day for it. Some games such as MGS4 I buy an entire system for. At the moment the only game I'm really looking forward to is little big planet. That I will be buying at launch.

With all that said however, I am a frequent member at cheapassgamer and will always try to find deals whenever I can. No reason to spend money just to spend it, right?

[animesuperj]

I don't buy at fullprice because I get a discount. Also cause most of the new games suck, and I don't want to pay $60 for a game that I'll play for 10 minutes. I will if it's actually worth it (as other people have said). Mainly, unless I really, really want the game or I doubt I'll ever see it again; I'll wait a month for a used copy to come in at a lower price. It's not worth it with how many bad games (imo) have been coming out lately. Although, this christmas season seems to be pretty good. I dunno, I just have been buying older titles (SNES) recently cause I haven't been as interested in next gen games as of late.

[TonyTheTiger]

Not for people who visit web sites like Gamestats.com or Metacritic.com. :)

Touché. Though with few exceptions the entire console's library looks like a sea of shovelware and I want to be lazy enough where I can look at the box and know whether I'd like it or not. Is that too much to ask? What is the world coming to?

[DiabolicalAdvocate]

If it's a game that I'm dying to sink my teeth into, I'll buy it on release day. I'll even pre-order/pay for them well in advance.

I've gotten more patient, but that wasn't always the case. Here's my list of first-day purchases I've made this gen:

Assassins Creed
Bioshock
COD 4
Conan
Condemned 2
Dark Sector
Devil May Cry 4
F.E.A.R(PS3)
Folklore
Gears of War
Heavenly Sword
Kane and Lynch
Lost Odyssey
Marvel Ultimate Alliance
Mass Effect
MGS 4 Limited Edition (X2)
Ninja Gaiden Sigma
Ninja Gaiden Sigma Collector's Edition (X2)
Orange Box
Oblivion
Rainbow Six Vegas
Rainbow Six Vegas 2
Resistance
Uncharted

A number of these purchases I regret, most I don't. The ones I really regret are not those that have dropped in price, but the ones that have sat on my shelf collecting dust since I got them. And I still own all of them except for Kane and Lynch and Oblivion. The NGS collectors editions and one of the MGS 4 limited editions were purchased to sell or trade(to other collectors) at a later date, and the NGS CE's aren't easy to find, so no regrets there.

Part of the fun I have with this hobby is playing games when they first come out. I also HATE used games. It's not economical, but to me this is the cost of consumption. It's like choosing to eat at a more "upscale" restaurant vs. eating at McDonalds; both will get you fed, but the experience isn't the same.

That being said, I have learned to be more patient and more selective, but I will never stop buying games at launch completely, unless I get out of this hobby all together.

[Trebuken]

First I visit all the deals sites around the time of a games release. If I can find a way to save $10 or more I'm more likely to buy the game. I do not trade my games in like many who pay full price do so I am more interested in those deals.

Now the big games - Gears of War 2, Resistance 2, Super Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime 2, et. I will pay full price for. I think Metal Gear Solid 4 was the last game I paid full price for.

Now from September until the end of November I tend to buy 5-10 games at f3ull price, more if they are below $59.99. If I find a couple of games for $49.99 instead of $59.99 I have $20 to put toward a new game.

Anyways I have 10 games preordered at Gamestop and will likely add a couple more because of release dates being pushed back. I put a little money on these games every now and then so that when they are released I only have to spend about half of their full price in a given week. It's a sort of budgeting, but it is crucial that I pick the games correctly, the previews of many games are much better than some of the games.

Unfortunately the Limited Editions are the hard spot for me. What makes them worth it? Bioshock is the only one I have bought at full price, I bought the PC version. Have you noticed that the PC versions of games are almost always $10 less, and that they are graphically superior? Too bad there aren't more of them...anyways I have Fable II and Resistance 2 preordered as Limited Editions...

[videogameking26]

I usually buy only the must have games at full price like for Silent Hill: Homecoming as I been waiting for that to release for awhile now, it will be a day 1 for sure...like yes I've bought a ton at full price this gen but am doing better with waiting for some to get lower in price like I did for Conan, Viking, Dark Sector and a few more.

[Cryomancer]

I tend to only buy new/full retail titles for companies / games I wish to support. Like when previously Japanese-Exclusive 360 games I wanted come over, I buy them full price. I went out of my way to pay full retail for EDF when I could have bought it at half the price because I want to see D3 make money so they can continue localizing games I enjoy. Voting with my dollar I suppose.

[Nature Boy]

From what I can tell, they asked 452 people this question: "if more games for next-gen consoles were priced at 59.99, which of the following would be true"

The results, therefore, are misleading if you're trying to start a fresh rant about the price of games these days.

First of all, based on my experience reading and posting on this site for a few years, nobody likes admitting they pay full price for *anything,* let alone new releases. It's like a badge of pride when you get a deal. Assuming that website is similar, I'd *expect* to see the number of people okay with 59.99 to be lower than I would if I had a true random sample.

Second of all, the question is asking what people would think of if MORE games were priced higher. They are asking people what they would think if new games like the upcoming Viva Pinata sequel started creeping up to 59.99, not what people think about spending 59.99 on, say, Gears of War 2 which comes out in an environment where you have options.

[SegaAges]

It depends on the game. The only games so far I gotten brand new when it first came out (which includes pre-orders):

Sonic the Hedgehog (360)
Rock Band Special Edition (360)
Project Sylpheed (360) <- pre-ordered
Dawn of War: SoulStorm (PC) <- pre-ordered

All of the games I wanted to play super bad.

[exit]

I only buy games I know I want for full retail, otherwise I wait for the game to hit Greatest Hits, or until it drops in the discount bin.


Now before everyone tries to knock me out like my name is Chuck Lidell and your name is Rashad Evans, let me clarify my earlier statement.

Hey everyone gets a lucky hit every once in awhile, but I'm sure you'd rather be a Chuck than a Tito.

[jdc]

If Turismo 5 released tomorrow, I'm there at full price. For me it depends on A) whether it's a gotta-have title and B) how much life/length/replayablility a title has. My habits have changed a lot over the years. I now tend to buy cheap used last-gen games while waiting for "not so gotta-have" current-gen titles to cool down a bit. You've GOTTA love it when you can score Steel Battalion for $50 complete!! It makes this insane hobby/jones less expensive than it might be. I've already been through the large bux end of it.

[The 1 2 P]

Hey everyone gets a lucky hit every once in awhile, but I'm sure you'd rather be a Chuck than a Tito.

Rashad didn't get lucky. He wanted to punch Chuck and he did. He continues to get better with each match. Stop hating. As for Tito, he hasn't been a relevant MMA fighter since 2004.

[exit]

Rashad didn't get lucky. He wanted to punch Chuck and he did. He continues to get better with each match. Stop hating. As for Tito, he hasn't been a relevant MMA fighter since 2004.

They both hit each other at the same time, only difference was that Rashad hit Chuck (as Joe Rogan would say) on the button, I doubt that Rashad (and especially Chuck) expected to get a knockout as a result. I'm not putting Rashad down either, he's proven to be a very good fighter, I'm just saying that he got lucky with that hit and he even looked surprised that it happened.

If that didn't happen, the Chuck probably would've caught him as he continued to dance in the octagon like it was the club, that type of showboating is what will get him in trouble in the future and will cost him a match.

As for Tito, he became irrelevant the second Chuck beat the shit out of him in 2006, then he started to down spiral into the joke that he now is.

But anyway, didn't mean to derail the topic like that.

So yeah high prices suck and such. Carry on.