View Full Version : GoldenEye remake for Wii/DS out this fall
Oobgarm
06-07-2010, 01:15 PM
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/06/05/report-new-goldeneye-coming-in-november-to-be-revealed-at-e3
The first comment says it all for me, and sums up my exact reaction:
"A new golden eye" = OMG!
"for the Wii and DS" = Noooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Lanzo
06-07-2010, 02:01 PM
That's awesome, but I feel the same way. Who wants to play goldeneye on a ds? And the wii? Hopefully I can use my gamecube controllers instead or I might just pass this up.
Neil Koch
06-07-2010, 02:03 PM
I think it might be an on-rails/light gun shooter instead of a FPS. I generally like those games on the Wii, but they might as well just make a new Bond game if they're going that route, especially if Brosnan is going to be subsitiuted with Craig.
BetaWolf47
06-07-2010, 02:15 PM
The game is supposedly being developed by n-Space and Eurocom
Screw it then. Nothing to get excited about. n-Space hasn't developed anything noteworthy aside from Geist, and even that game was meh.
Vectorman0
06-07-2010, 02:15 PM
Ruining the GoldeneEye name once wasn't enough? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk2_detonator)
Frankie_Says_Relax
06-07-2010, 02:22 PM
Any Goldeneye game that isn't under development by the Free Radical team responsible for the Timesplitters series is guaranteed to disappoint.
Everything that everybody really loved about Goldeneye went with David Doak when he left Rare and formed Free Radical.
Even Perfect Dark on the N64 while good didn't QUITE match the overall feel of Goldeneye without the core dev input of Doak and Co.
If we never get a Timesplitters 4 the spirit of the Goldeneye games died a noble death with Timesplitters Future Perfect (mainly the day they shut down the online servers).
j_factor
06-07-2010, 02:45 PM
If it's the same game with Wii controls, I don't see the problem.
BetaWolf47
06-07-2010, 02:59 PM
If we never get a Timesplitters 4 the spirit of the Goldeneye games died a noble death with Timesplitters Future Perfect (mainly the day they shut down the online servers).
Despite being put on hold, Timesplitters 4 is still coming! It better, at least. Timesplitters 2 and Future Perfect were the main reason that FPSes stayed alive on Gamecube.
Baloo
06-07-2010, 03:12 PM
Despite being put on hold, Timesplitters 4 is still coming! It better, at least. Timesplitters 2 and Future Perfect were the main reason that FPSes stayed alive on Gamecube.
Crytek UK shelved the game until there is a "good time" to release it, so who knows when and if it'll even come out.
I seriously doubt we'll ever see Timesplitters 4 or Battlefront 3.
The 1 2 P
06-07-2010, 04:00 PM
This isn't really a rumor anymore.....it's going to happen. But I'm also disappointed that despite everything Activision went thru initially to try and get this game released on the Wii and 360--they have now settled on releasing it on the Wii and Ds instead(just to appease Nintendo). Considering it's a shooter game, they get an epic fail for that. Neither the Wii or Ds can handle shooters the way the 360 can.
I'm curious to see what specially gets added to this remake, such as multiplayer. I'm guessing it will have some sort of cross compatibility between the Wii and Ds. But ultimately I'm not very pumped for this game considering the platforms it's limited to.
BHvrd
06-07-2010, 05:15 PM
Wtf this ain't no remake! It's a new game. I have been bambozzled!
Sonicwolf
06-07-2010, 05:24 PM
Ruining the GoldeneEye name once wasn't enough? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk2_detonator)
^^
That
In recent discussions with people about games that I found to be insulting to a franchise or video game legacy, Rogue Agent came in at number one. Just a mediocre James Bond game with the GoldenEye name slapped on for quick profit. Toying with peoples feelings of nostalgia; Being a parasite on greatness.
Kitsune Sniper
06-07-2010, 05:39 PM
I think you mean "Twice"... Goldeneye: Source wasn't really very good. :p
Sonicwolf
06-07-2010, 05:46 PM
I think you mean "Twice"... Goldeneye: Source wasn't really very good. :p
At least it's not a shameless cash-in.
Jorpho
06-07-2010, 10:03 PM
Some good things can still spring from Goldeneye.
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1933149
Leo_A
06-07-2010, 11:43 PM
If it's the same game with Wii controls, I don't see the problem.
It's not going to be a remake. It's a new title based on the same movie property as the N64 game.
Poofta!
06-08-2010, 12:19 AM
Ruining the GoldeneEye name once wasn't enough? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk2_detonator)
Any Goldeneye game that isn't under development by the Free Radical team responsible for the Timesplitters series is guaranteed to disappoint.
Everything that everybody really loved about Goldeneye went with David Doak when he left Rare and formed Free Radical.
Even Perfect Dark on the N64 while good didn't QUITE match the overall feel of Goldeneye without the core dev input of Doak and Co.
If we never get a Timesplitters 4 the spirit of the Goldeneye games died a noble death with Timesplitters Future Perfect (mainly the day they shut down the online servers).
is there really anything else anyone else can say?
in my book, its just another piece of shovel ware.
swlovinist
06-08-2010, 01:44 AM
Yet another Bond game = crap
Goldeneye remake = :)
Goldeneye remake with wii controls = :(
Goldeneye remake on the DS = meh
Screw it, I am going to just bust out Goldeneye on the N64 and not wait for some company to f it up.
j_factor
06-08-2010, 02:35 AM
It's not going to be a remake. It's a new title based on the same movie property as the N64 game.
That's not what the OP says.
alec006
06-08-2010, 04:40 AM
Hmm Goldeneye remake thats actually the same levels as the original...GREAT...Daniel Craig as Bond in them...NOOO...seriously they can't get Pierce to voice act in a video game,he did it in Everything Or Nothing! I guess we shaw see what they have in store for us,this better be good Activision!
WAIT: From the developer of the World is Not Enough
D:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Leo_A
06-08-2010, 04:43 AM
That's not what the OP says.
It's just an attempt to cash in on the success and nostalgia of the N64 classic. Reading 5 or 6 news articles on this topic, things like this carefully worded statement keep popping up ("a modernized version of the classic story with the new Bond").
It's a new game based on the same movie as the 64 game with some inspiration taken from the N64 game no doubt. It isn't a remake of the N64 game so don't get your hopes up.
No matter what course of events you subscribe to over why the XBLA port of Goldeneye was stillborn, it's clear that Microsoft owned Rare still has at least partial control over the classic game. It isn't happening.
They're betting people won't be looking past the name. And judging from message boards like this one, it appears to be a safe bet that most gamers will consider any new game with Goldeneye in the title as a remake of the N64 game. A lot of Wii owners are going to be in for a surprise someday when they pop this thing into their Wii and start playing. ;)
Rob2600
06-08-2010, 08:08 AM
WAIT: From the developer of the World is Not Enough
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
The World Is not Enough received excellent reviews in 2000. Eurocom did a great job.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/n64/worldisnotenough
Greg2600
06-08-2010, 07:15 PM
TWINE was a much better story game than Goldeneye. However, the N64 wasn't powerful enough for it sometimes, and there was a lot of slowdown. Also the multiplayer was not very good at all.
As for Goldeneye by Activision, what happened, they're not releasing a game on the 360/PS3? Are they LucasArts now? There's probably a much larger audience for those kinds of games on those systems than the Wii.
Sonicwolf
06-08-2010, 07:18 PM
WAIT: From the developer of the World is Not Enough
D:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
TWINE was a pretty good game. Not as good as GoldenEye but a hell of a lot better than every other Bond game since. Wait. I keep forgetting that there was a PlayStation version. Well, that version was inferior to the N64 one but still pretty fun.
This isn't really a rumor anymore.....it's going to happen. But I'm also disappointed that despite everything Activision went thru initially to try and get this game released on the Wii and 360--they have now settled on releasing it on the Wii and Ds instead(just to appease Nintendo). Considering it's a shooter game, they get an epic fail for that. Neither the Wii or Ds can handle shooters the way the 360 can.
The games doesn't have to have fancy 360/PS3 graphics. if it truly is a remake, all it has to do is improve the graphics, sounds, and go online. As weak as the Wii is, it is WORLDS above the N64 in abilities.
Rob2600
06-08-2010, 08:18 PM
WAIT: From the developer of the World is Not Enough
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
The World Is not Enough received excellent reviews in 2000. Eurocom did a great job.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/n64/worldisnotenough
Wait. I keep forgetting that there was a PlayStation version.
Ahh, good point. My comment was solely about the N64 version.
Greg2600
06-08-2010, 08:38 PM
The PS1 TWINE and Tomorrow Never Dies before it, were done by Black Ops. Tomorrow Never Dies was pretty good, for Playstation capabilities.
j_factor
06-08-2010, 09:18 PM
Tomorrow Never Dies was almost a good game, but hampered by some serious issues.
The 1 2 P
06-09-2010, 01:56 AM
Tommorrow Never Dies sucked on the PS1. It tried very hard to be like Syphon Filter(despite the skiing and driving sequences) and failed miserably. Not only did I think it wasn't a good Bond game, I didn't even think it was a good action game.
The games doesn't have to have fancy 360/PS3 graphics. if it truly is a remake, all it has to do is improve the graphics, sounds, and go online. As weak as the Wii is, it is WORLDS above the N64 in abilities.
Who said anything about graphics? The fact remains that the 360 and PS3 handle shooters much better than the Wii does. And I don't even need to comment on Ds shooters. I also have a Wii but I'm not planning on getting this game for it(maybe once it goes on clearance for less than $20).
It's just a shame that Activision chose to go this route to try and cash in on nostagia for the N64 game because this game will be very different from that game without Rare at the helm. And it's also a shame that this is the result of them trying to appease Nintendo instead of maximizing this game to it's full potential. Oh well.
Who said anything about graphics? The fact remains that the 360 and PS3 handle shooters much better than the Wii does. And I don't even need to comment on Ds shooters. I also have a Wii but I'm not planning on getting this game for it(maybe once it goes on clearance for less than $20).
The 360/PS3 can handle pretty much everything better than the Wii, no doubt. Bit IF (huge "if' I know) it is just a remake, than the Wii's abilities are fine. In fact I'd rather see this game on a less powerful system. 1080p graphics would be too much of a jump, for me at least. I am also an ideologue who thinks it just belongs on a Nintendo system because we remember it on a Nintendo system.
Of course, this is all a moot point if it's not a remake, such as Super Mario All-Stars was.
The 1 2 P
06-09-2010, 02:50 AM
The 360/PS3 can handle pretty much everything better than the Wii, no doubt. Bit IF (huge "if' I know) it is just a remake, than the Wii's abilities are fine. In fact I'd rather see this game on a less powerful system. 1080p graphics would be too much of a jump, for me at least. I am also an ideologue who thinks it just belongs on a Nintendo system because we remember it on a Nintendo system.
Of course, this is all a moot point if it's not a remake, such as Super Mario All-Stars was.
I think it's just going to be a reimagining, which means a new game using the Goldeneye moniker. Since they are building it from the ground up for the Wii and Ds it should of course handle the graphics well. I just prefer my shooters with an actual analog controller instead of a Wii-remote.
Also, Craig(my favorite Bond) shouldn't be in a Goldeneye game--Brosman should. But I suppose thats just part of their whole reimagining.
j_factor
06-09-2010, 03:43 AM
How is aiming with a Wii remote worse than aiming with a stick? Do you hate using a mouse too?
garagesaleking!!
06-09-2010, 12:22 PM
So much potential, such little expectations. If its a wii/ds exclusive exclusive, it will blow.
Vectorman0
06-09-2010, 01:45 PM
How is aiming with a Wii remote worse than aiming with a stick?
Is that a serious question?
I think most of us prefer a controller because we can do better with it. That's the simple answer.
I'm not sure why every game that can intuitively support both a Wiimote and classic controller doesn't do so. Is Nintendo bullying developers into only supporting the Wiimote?
BetaWolf47
06-09-2010, 02:03 PM
This complaining is getting annoying. Problem isn't the Wii remote. It's the developers not putting enough time into perfecting the controls. Most 3rd-party developers haven't even tried to make a decent game on Wii since... ever.
Oobgarm
06-09-2010, 02:09 PM
Is that a serious question?
I think most of us prefer a controller because we can do better with it. That's the simple answer.
I'm kinda surprised that a person who frequents these forums would even have to ask that question.
j_factor
06-09-2010, 02:35 PM
Is that a serious question?
I think most of us prefer a controller because we can do better with it. That's the simple answer.
I don't understand how you'd do worse by pointing. Did you never play light gun games?
I thought most people thought the Wii was an improvement for Metroid Prime at least.
I don't understand how you'd do worse by pointing. Did you never play light gun games?
I thought most people thought the Wii was an improvement for Metroid Prime at least.
I did. But what really was a huge improvement was Resident Evil 4 Wii. I honestly don't know anyone who preferred the other versions control. But to each their own.
Greg2600
06-09-2010, 06:43 PM
Why is Daniel Craig's name being mentioned? I very much doubt he will be lending his voice and likeness to this game, it would cost too much, and probably not make sense. I very much doubt Brosnan would do so either, unfortunately, as he won't be cheap and his departure from Bond was not exactly smooth.
Industry insider expects a poor sales result (http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=8640&t=mi6&s=news) from the game. Also, as for the next all new Bond game(s), the untitled project was put on hold (http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=8567&catid=7&t=mi6&s=news), because Activision needed its Raven Studios developers to work on the next Call of Duty. The other game, a driving/racing game called Bloodstone, from Bizarre, is constantly delayed (http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=8513&catid=7&t=mi6&s=news).
alec006
06-10-2010, 04:40 AM
I just hope get Alan Cumming to do Boris,otherwise I'm not playing it. Nothing beats his "YES I AM INVINCEBLE!"
Nesmaster
06-11-2010, 07:29 AM
I did. But what really was a huge improvement was Resident Evil 4 Wii. I honestly don't know anyone who preferred the other versions control. But to each their own.
Right here. The Wii Remote has been and is continuing to ruin Nintendo games for me.
I'm warning NINTENDO NOW. Leave waggle in this generation. The Master says so. Or have the option. Forced waggle is like fishing without a hook.
In other words, you're starving longtime fans to death. LOL
Greg2600
06-11-2010, 02:07 PM
Why do you have to use the Wii mote? Just use a controller.
Frankie_Says_Relax
06-11-2010, 02:56 PM
I did. But what really was a huge improvement was Resident Evil 4 Wii. I honestly don't know anyone who preferred the other versions control. But to each their own.
You can count me as a huge huge fan of RE4 who absolutely preferred using the classic control scheme.
And I did try to use the Wiimote scheme. Halfway through the game the novelty wore off and my arm was way too tired to go the distance.
It's official, and is a remake! You can see the trailer here!
http://www.infendo.com/e3-leak-new-goldeneye-exclusive-for-wii/
Jorpho
06-15-2010, 08:09 AM
Wow, forty seconds of nondescript people sitting around a conference table talking. This is a new low for trailers.
Oobgarm
06-15-2010, 08:15 AM
Doesn't impress. I think "meh" is a good response.
jonebone
06-15-2010, 08:37 AM
Doesn't look like a remake to me, just looks like they are reusing the title. Looks like new gameplay / level designs...
No. not new level designs.
Go back and play the original - all of those scenes were instantly recognisable right down to the seewping path the camera takes on the first level that was shown on trailer right after the golen eye logo. the toilet scene, bungee jump, stack, snow level - even buildings are in same locations and paint schemes are even the same, everything identical except for improved graphics and some extra details like parked vehicles etc.
It's too early to say of course, but this game excites me greatly!
out of interest jonebone - what makes you think it's got new level designs? and more shocking - what on earth made you think the gameplay is different based on that trailer????? even the weapons are the same!!!!!
The 1 2 P
06-15-2010, 05:30 PM
I can't wait for Microsoft to announce their version. Stay tuned.
Enigmus
06-15-2010, 05:42 PM
If they include all of the movie versions of James Bond, I'm in.
Also, that trailer was pretty epic at parts, and not those damn conference table parts.
I can't wait for Microsoft to announce their version. Stay tuned.
Not gonna happen, and if they do it won't be like the original.
The 1 2 P
06-15-2010, 05:51 PM
Not gonna happen, and if they do it won't be like the original.
It will be better than the original. Like I said--stay tuned.
It will be better than the original. Like I said--stay tuned.
Impossible, unless it's at least a partial remake. The original is too highly regarded for nostalgia reasons alone to be surpassed, even if a new version is indeed better.
The 1 2 P
06-15-2010, 06:10 PM
Impossible, unless it's at least a partial remake. The original is too highly regarded for nostalgia reasons alone to be surpassed, even if a new version is indeed better.
No it's not impossible. Perfect Dark on the 360 was much better than the N64 version, partly due to achievements and online multiplayer. Anyway, don't expect any announcements before the Wii version gets released this fall. And it might even fall thru before that time. Thats why I said stay tuned.
No it's not impossible. Perfect Dark on the 360 was much better than the N64 version, partly due to achievements and online multiplayer. Anyway, don't expect any announcements before the Wii version gets released this fall. And it might even fall thru before that time. Thats why I said stay tuned.
I hear ya. I'm not saying it won't be better, but some of us are just stubborn, and no matter what, will look at the N64 version as superior. Look at it this was, was Goldeneye as multiplayer really better than Call of Duty: MW2 multiplayer? Many still say yes, and it may be for nostalgic reasons.
The 1 2 P
06-15-2010, 06:19 PM
I hear ya. I'm not saying it won't be better, but some of us are just stubborn, and no matter what, will look at the N64 version as superior. Look at it this was, was Goldeneye as multiplayer really better than Call of Duty: MW2 multiplayer? Many still say yes, and it may be for nostalgic reasons.
So are you saying you don't think the Wii version will live up to the N64 version? I think the fact that you can use the classic controller(if Nintendo allows that) will give it atleast that advantage over the original. I love some of the N64 classics but I always hated that controller.
So are you saying you don't think the Wii version will live up to the N64 version? I think the fact that you can use the classic controller(if Nintendo allows that) will give it atleast that advantage over the original. I love some of the N64 classics but I always hated that controller.
I didn't say I feel like that, just that some people are set in their ways that the N64 can't be beat. Honestly, I am quite excited about the Wii version. I hope it's more of a remake with online abilities than a new version.
Greg2600
06-15-2010, 07:24 PM
Daniel Craig = FAIL!!!!!! Don't get me wrong, I like Craig, but that was Pierce Brosnan's movie! Mr. Craig should have refused to provide his likeness.
http://inlinethumb49.webshots.com/37232/2793152230081719177S500x500Q85.jpg
Right up there with the Wii version of Ghostbusters, the joke that was Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings, Wii games off classic movie franchises.......
PS: The regularly schedule Bond game (360/PS3/Wii) by Activision is on hold. Activision needed the developers to work on the next Call of Duty, as I posted the other day.
Leo_A
06-15-2010, 08:06 PM
No it's not impossible. Perfect Dark on the 360 was much better than the N64 version, partly due to achievements and online multiplayer. Anyway, don't expect any announcements before the Wii version gets released this fall. And it might even fall thru before that time. Thats why I said stay tuned.
This isn't going to be like Perfect Dark on the 360. It's not an HD makeover of the N64 classic and I doubt we'll be seeing anything coming to the 360, especially the original game.
jonebone
06-16-2010, 08:53 AM
Go back and play the original - all of those scenes were instantly recognisable right down to the seewping path the camera takes on the first level that was shown on trailer right after the golen eye logo. the toilet scene, bungee jump, stack, snow level - even buildings are in same locations and paint schemes are even the same, everything identical except for improved graphics and some extra details like parked vehicles etc.
out of interest jonebone - what makes you think it's got new level designs? and more shocking - what on earth made you think the gameplay is different based on that trailer????? even the weapons are the same!!!!!
Umm GE is my favorite game all time, N64 is my favorite system all time and I used to speed run GE and PD at the-elite.net so I don't need to replay the original to know there is already new content added.
When do you hop into a truck and ride around? When do you blow up a boat in the dam level? I'm sure there were a million other subtle things that flashed across the screen but it was too quick.
Yes the levels are BASED on the originals but they are obviously tweaked and changed. This is NOT like Perfect Dark on XBL Arcade which is an exact 1:1 remake. The Bond name has constantly been butchered since Goldeneye with everyone trying to cash in, that's why most of us GE veterans are still pessimistic.
Oobgarm
06-16-2010, 09:10 AM
This is NOT like Perfect Dark on XBL Arcade which is an exact 1:1 remake.
This.
Nothing will ever be GoldenEye as it was on N64, outside of a full-on, faithful, 1:1 remake. It's blatantly obvious that Activision is simply cribbing the name for recognition only-they'll make their own version, borrowing ideas from the original in hopes of pulling in unsuspecting gamers or those who remember the original but don't have a sentimental attachment to it like many of us here.
I'll give it a look when it comes out. But I am making it a point to have little/no expectations out of it. To me, it's just another shooter. I honestly hope that the game turns out good, but I won't be one of the disappointed ones if it doesn't.
BetaWolf47
06-16-2010, 12:49 PM
The thing I'm worried about is Activision trying to modernize the game with different standards than the original. It Bond is turned into the Marcus Fenix cliche, and the graphics are turned gray and brown, the atmosphere of the game will be ruined. Really, if they just update the controls, music, and graphics, and throw in some extra modes, we'll be happy!
Jonebone, sorry, i stand corrected.
http://worthplaying.com/event/E3_2010/E3_2010_June_15/74971/
Greg2600
06-16-2010, 06:46 PM
I don't know that Activision prompted the creation of this game? It could very well have been at Nintendo's asking, perhaps a bit of touche to Microsoft for releasing Perfect Dark on XBLA? Activision has been developing a follow up to the somewhat disappointing Quantum of Solace game, that it's on hold right now. Activision probably just licensed the engine from another developer's Wii game, or one of their own, and slapped some new textures/maps/models on it. My thing is if nostalgia is supposed to sell this game, having Daniel Craig is ridiculous.
Frankie_Says_Relax
06-16-2010, 07:01 PM
They forgot to reveal the full title of the game at E3.
007 Goldeneye: Inevitable Disappointment
The 1 2 P
06-16-2010, 07:37 PM
They forgot to reveal the full title of the game at E3.
007 Goldeneye: Inevitable Disappointment
Thats obviously a sequel to Rogue Agent.
monkeychemist
06-17-2010, 07:21 AM
Daniel Craig = FAIL!!!!!! Don't get me wrong, I like Craig, but that was Pierce Brosnan's movie! Mr. Craig should have refused to provide his likeness.
Right up there with the Wii version of Ghostbusters, the joke that was Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings, Wii games off classic movie franchises.......
PS: The regularly schedule Bond game (360/PS3/Wii) by Activision is on hold. Activision needed the developers to work on the next Call of Duty, as I posted the other day.
This right there just ruins it. It just goes to show how far they are willing to change the game. They have oddjob, jaws etc, why not the correct BOND??? wtf!
The 1 2 P
06-17-2010, 12:35 PM
They have oddjob, jaws etc, why not the correct BOND??? wtf!
They would probably have to pay Pierce some kind of royalty check if they used his likeness. But I agree that he should be the Bond used for this game, not Craig.
BHvrd
06-17-2010, 07:26 PM
They would probably have to pay Pierce some kind of royalty check if they used his likeness. But I agree that he should be the Bond used for this game, not Craig.
Hence why they will not be getting a royalty check from me.
End of story. Game over. No Pierce Brosnan, no buy. Dun care how it plays they have already made a big no-no. Nope, uh-uh. http://www.runemasterstudios.com/graemlins/images/snooty.gif
Gameguy
06-17-2010, 07:51 PM
They would probably have to pay Pierce some kind of royalty check if they used his likeness. But I agree that he should be the Bond used for this game, not Craig.
There was a game of From Russia with Love made a few years ago that used Sean Connery's likeness in it, switching the Bonds for this latest game doesn't make sense. I know that they're made by different companies but that would be a bad reason to change it, simply because of royalties. Actually the more I think about it, I wouldn't mind if they switched it from Pierce Brosnan to Sean Connery as that would be awesome.
Maybe Pierce Brosnan refused to take part in this current game.
Leo_A
06-17-2010, 07:53 PM
Hence why they will not be getting a royalty check from me.
End of story. Game over. No Pierce Brosnan, no buy. Dun care how it plays they have already made a big no-no. Nope, uh-uh. http://www.runemasterstudios.com/graemlins/images/snooty.gif
You care that much about what face your character has even when you won't be seeing it during 99% of the game?
Greg2600
06-17-2010, 08:07 PM
Sean Connery was paid a LOT of money for From Russia With Love, but it was Sean Connery, and he donated the salary to charity. Leo, it's not just the face, all the cut scenes and the voice of the character is Daniel Craig, not Pierce. If Pierce won't do it, then make the character generic with a professional voice actor playing the part, like they did in Agent Under Fire. I mean, I doubt they used the face of Christopher Lee for Scaramanga.