Log in

View Full Version : Dutch Supreme Court Sees Game Objects As Goods [Slashdot]



DP ServBot
01-31-2012, 09:10 PM
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ESFB7r92X4UKz78Cmgn8hbKkCaM/0/di (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ESFB7r92X4UKz78Cmgn8hbKkCaM/0/da)
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ESFB7r92X4UKz78Cmgn8hbKkCaM/1/di (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ESFB7r92X4UKz78Cmgn8hbKkCaM/1/da)
thrill12 writes "The Dutch Supreme Court ruled on January 31st that the taking away of possessions in the game Runescape from a 13-year-old boy, who was threatened with a (real) knife, was in fact theft because the possessions could be seen as actual goods. The highest court explained this not by arguing it was software that was copied, but by stating that the game data were real goods acquired through 'effort and time investment,' and 'the principal had the actual and exclusive dominion of the goods' — up until the moment the other guy took them away, that is."http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Dutch+Supreme+Court+Sees+Game+Objects+ As+Goods%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FzgsHud)http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgames.slashdot.org%2Fsto ry%2F12%2F01%2F31%2F216216%2Fdutch-supreme-court-sees-game-objects-as-goods%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfaceb ook)http://www.digitpress.com//a.fsdn.com/sd/googleplus_icon_large.png (https://plusone.google.com/_/+1/confirm?hl=en&url=http://slashdot.org)

Read more of this story (http://games.slashdot.org/story/12/01/31/216216/dutch-supreme-court-sees-game-objects-as-goods?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdotGames/~4/odPaCAxehdA

More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotGames/~3/odPaCAxehdA/dutch-supreme-court-sees-game-objects-as-goods)

RP2A03
01-31-2012, 10:13 PM
I think the ServBot needs to have his circuits checked — he is double posting threads.

Berserker
01-31-2012, 11:02 PM
Yeah, not sure what that's about. I deleted the other one.