Judge Grudgingly Awards $3.6 Million In DRM Circumvention Case [Slashdot]

[DP ServBot]

http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/0/di (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/0/da)
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/1/di (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/1/da)
Fluffeh writes "The case involves an online game, MapleStory, and some people who set up an alternate server, UMaple, allowing users to play the game with the official game client, but without logging into the official MapleStory servers. In this case, the people behind UMaple apparently ignored the lawsuit, leading to a default judgment. Although annoyed with MapleStory (The Judge knocked down a request for $68,764.23 — in profits made by UMaple — down to just $398.98), the law states a minimum of $200 per infringement. Multiply that by 17,938 users of UMaple... and you get $3.6 million. In fact, it sounds like the court would very much like to decrease the amount, but notes that 'nevertheless, the court is powerless to deviate from the DMCA's statutory minimum.' Eric Goldman also has some further op-ed and information regarding the case and judgement." http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Judge+Grudgingly+Awards+%243.6+Million +In+DRM+Circumvention+Case%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly% 2FI0WX0x) http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgames.slashdot.org%2Fsto ry%2F12%2F04%2F19%2F0131243%2Fjudge-grudgingly-awards-36-million-in-drm-circumvention-case%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebo ok) http://www.gstatic.com/images/icons/gplus-16.png (http://plus.google.com/share?url=http://games.slashdot.org/story/12/04/19/0131243/judge-grudgingly-awards-36-million-in-drm-circumvention-case?utm_source=slashdot&utm_medium=googleplus)

Read more of this story (http://games.slashdot.org/story/12/04/19/0131243/judge-grudgingly-awards-36-million-in-drm-circumvention-case?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdotGames/~4/QLMOqY7Qn9g

[Griking]

http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/0/di (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/0/da)
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/1/di (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/I6MODpIMItmmONQeabe8kvQwn7A/1/da)
Fluffeh writes "The case involves an online game, MapleStory, and some people who set up an alternate server, UMaple, allowing users to play the game with the official game client, but without logging into the official MapleStory servers. In this case, the people behind UMaple apparently ignored the lawsuit, leading to a default judgment. Although annoyed with MapleStory (The Judge knocked down a request for $68,764.23 — in profits made by UMaple — down to just $398.98), the law states a minimum of $200 per infringement. Multiply that by 17,938 users of UMaple... and you get $3.6 million. In fact, it sounds like the court would very much like to decrease the amount, but notes that 'nevertheless, the court is powerless to deviate from the DMCA's statutory minimum.' Eric Goldman also has some further op-ed and information regarding the case and judgement." http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Judge+Grudgingly+Awards+%243.6+Million +In+DRM+Circumvention+Case%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly% 2FI0WX0x) http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgames.slashdot.org%2Fsto ry%2F12%2F04%2F19%2F0131243%2Fjudge-grudgingly-awards-36-million-in-drm-circumvention-case%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebo ok) http://www.gstatic.com/images/icons/gplus-16.png (http://plus.google.com/share?url=http://games.slashdot.org/story/12/04/19/0131243/judge-grudgingly-awards-36-million-in-drm-circumvention-case?utm_source=slashdot&utm_medium=googleplus)

Read more of this story (http://games.slashdot.org/story/12/04/19/0131243/judge-grudgingly-awards-36-million-in-drm-circumvention-case?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdotGames/~4/QLMOqY7Qn9g



Interesting that the judge determined that each user was a separate infringement by the host of the game. Shouldn't each player be a separate case of infringement with a separate defendant for each case?