View Full Version : Joust (Atari 8-bit)
digitalpress
11-16-2003, 03:22 PM
Critique the critique!
Rate this review on a scale of 1-10. Please explain your score. Was the review entertaining? Informative? Well-written? All of these things should go toward your critique.
http://www.digitpress.com/reviews/contest/joust_8bit.htm
digitalpress
11-16-2003, 03:22 PM
Critique the critique!
Rate this review on a scale of 1-10. Please explain your score. Was the review entertaining? Informative? Well-written? All of these things should go toward your critique.
http://www.digitpress.com/reviews/contest/joust_8bit.htm
Flack
11-16-2003, 10:04 PM
4.
Not terrible, but lacking a lot of information. I would definitely want to know about the arcade game, how the graphics and sound compare between the versions, etc. Also, there's no mention of flapping -- ie, the move that killed a thousand buttons.
Flack
11-16-2003, 10:04 PM
4.
Not terrible, but lacking a lot of information. I would definitely want to know about the arcade game, how the graphics and sound compare between the versions, etc. Also, there's no mention of flapping -- ie, the move that killed a thousand buttons.
Balloon Fight
11-16-2003, 10:23 PM
5
ditto. He didnt say if he liked the game also, and didnt tell about any of the bugs in the game. I also think that you should talk a little about the arcade since that is where it started.
Balloon Fight
11-16-2003, 10:23 PM
5
ditto. He didnt say if he liked the game also, and didnt tell about any of the bugs in the game. I also think that you should talk a little about the arcade since that is where it started.
Ascending Wordsmith
11-16-2003, 10:32 PM
5.5/10
It's good to see the reviewer touched on each of the aspects of the game, but it could use a bit more information in these areas as well. The read was easy and explicit.
Ascending Wordsmith
11-16-2003, 10:32 PM
5.5/10
It's good to see the reviewer touched on each of the aspects of the game, but it could use a bit more information in these areas as well. The read was easy and explicit.
maxlords
11-16-2003, 10:59 PM
4. It touched stuff, but it didn't really cover it. Parts of the review felt more like a manual than a review. It just doesn't really COVER the game, it instead brushes it.
maxlords
11-16-2003, 10:59 PM
4. It touched stuff, but it didn't really cover it. Parts of the review felt more like a manual than a review. It just doesn't really COVER the game, it instead brushes it.
o2william
11-17-2003, 12:03 AM
4/10
I share the sentiments of the earlier posters. Also, why no numerical ratings for Sound, Graphics, etc.?
o2william
11-17-2003, 12:03 AM
4/10
I share the sentiments of the earlier posters. Also, why no numerical ratings for Sound, Graphics, etc.?
NE146
11-17-2003, 12:37 AM
I too would've liked to see more comparisons between it and it's daddy arcade game. What are the similarites? What are the differences as far as gameplay goes? How do the graphics compare? etc.
I give it a 5
NE146
11-17-2003, 12:37 AM
I too would've liked to see more comparisons between it and it's daddy arcade game. What are the similarites? What are the differences as far as gameplay goes? How do the graphics compare? etc.
I give it a 5
NE146
11-17-2003, 12:38 AM
I too would've liked to see more comparisons between it and it's daddy arcade game. What are the similarites? What are the differences as far as gameplay goes? Does it make it better? Does it make it worse? Or does it just ma\ke it different? How do the graphics compare? etc.
I give it a 5
NE146
11-17-2003, 12:38 AM
I too would've liked to see more comparisons between it and it's daddy arcade game. What are the similarites? What are the differences as far as gameplay goes? Does it make it better? Does it make it worse? Or does it just ma\ke it different? How do the graphics compare? etc.
I give it a 5
digitalpress
11-18-2003, 07:49 AM
This one is getting "cut". Low review scores from our judges and forum. Sorry! Thanks for playing though... there are lots more contests coming up :)