View Full Version : Umhara Kawase (Super Famicom)
digitalpress
11-16-2003, 03:37 PM
Critique the critique!
Rate this review on a scale of 1-10. Please explain your score. Was the review entertaining? Informative? Well-written? All of these things should go toward your critique.
http://www.digitpress.com/reviews/contest/umharakawase.htm
digitalpress
11-16-2003, 03:37 PM
Critique the critique!
Rate this review on a scale of 1-10. Please explain your score. Was the review entertaining? Informative? Well-written? All of these things should go toward your critique.
http://www.digitpress.com/reviews/contest/umharakawase.htm
Jorpho
11-16-2003, 07:14 PM
Hey, Joe, shouldn't that be Umihara Kawase?
This is a nice enough review, although it's nothing particularly special. Why bother explaining the control scheme in such detail? It may have been more interesting to read about some of the advanced fishing techniques that are surely a significant part of the game.
7/10
Jorpho
11-16-2003, 07:14 PM
Hey, Joe, shouldn't that be Umihara Kawase?
This is a nice enough review, although it's nothing particularly special. Why bother explaining the control scheme in such detail? It may have been more interesting to read about some of the advanced fishing techniques that are surely a significant part of the game.
7/10
Flack
11-16-2003, 08:26 PM
6.
Decent job, but all the extra information bogged down the flow of the review.
Boy, I'm not going to have a single friend after this contest is over.
Flack
11-16-2003, 08:26 PM
6.
Decent job, but all the extra information bogged down the flow of the review.
Boy, I'm not going to have a single friend after this contest is over.
maxlords
11-17-2003, 12:56 AM
Honestly, the game sounds cooler than the review makes it sound. The review needs more focus. It got distracted by details and didn't go into how it feels to play it at any length, or a really cohesive reviewing. It was more "I noticed this, then this, then this". I give it a 6/10 but a gold star for effort :)
And now I want that game damn it.
maxlords
11-17-2003, 12:56 AM
Honestly, the game sounds cooler than the review makes it sound. The review needs more focus. It got distracted by details and didn't go into how it feels to play it at any length, or a really cohesive reviewing. It was more "I noticed this, then this, then this". I give it a 6/10 but a gold star for effort :)
And now I want that game damn it.
hamburgler
11-17-2003, 08:13 PM
6 of 10
Was great but didn't have the features of a normal review.
digitalpress
11-24-2003, 06:33 PM
Tonight will be the last batch of "cuts".
If your review isn't locked at midnight tonight, you're entitled to the Digital Press subscription, and your review will be moved onto the main contest site.
Unfortunately, not every review will make it.
This one is getting cut. Low review scores from our judges and forum. Sorry! Thanks for playing though... there are lots more contests coming up :)