Iron Draggon
09-15-2004, 11:03 PM
I just got my perfect positive feedback record tarnished with one neutral from a newb buyer who clearly didn't read the full description of my auction, or the payment options that I was willing to accept. First, he emails me and wants to know what my address is, so he can send my payment. I replied with my Paypal email address, since the auction clearly stated that I only accept Paypal. A few days go by, and I decide that I might as well try to be nice about it, or I'll never get paid and I'll end up with a negative, so I reply again and tell him that I'll accept a money order, but it has to be a USPS postal money order. I also politely tell him to please read the payment options next time. A few more days go by, and his money order arrives.
Not a USPS money order like I requested, so I had to go to my bank to cash it instead of going to the post office. This guy clearly failed all tests regarding his ability to follow directions while he was in school. I ship the item and fully expect to either have it returned to me with a request for a full refund, including what it cost him to ship it back to me, or to have an even bigger problem over it and have him claim that he never received it. Fortunately, neither one of those things happened, but this is how he thanks me for putting up with all his BS when he leaves his feedback for me on ebay:
Neutral: Thank you, but the card wasn't in mint condition.
The auction clearly stated that the card had 3 creases across the top, but was otherwise in mint condition. I really don't think that it was misleading.
So I replied with an equally ambivalent comment of my own in my profile:
Reply by irondraggon: You're welcome, the auction clearly stated there were 3 creases across the top.
I'm glad that I chose to wait until he left feedback for me, before I left any feedback for him. Normally, I'll leave positive feedback immediately upon receipt of payment, but in this case I had a bad feeling about the whole transaction, so I decided that I would wait and see what he said about me. So, tit for tat, he leaves a neutral for me, so he gets a neutral from me. I almost went ahead and left a neutral for him before he left any feedback for me anyway, so it wasn't exactly revenge. I was thinking about it anyway.
Neutral: Obviously didn't read the full description of the auction or the payment options.
Take that, you annoying little 18 feedback newb, #19 was your first neutral, and if you keep on putting other sellers through the same kinda crap that you put me through, you're gonna end up with your first negative soon.
This is the reason why I was reluctant to start selling on ebay with the same account that I've been using to buy on ebay for the past 4 years. Those darn newb buyers are the bane of every seller's existence. Just one newb bidder obviously doesn't read most of my listing, which was quite brief, and my perfect positive feedback record is forever tarnished with a neutral now.
I know it's not that big a deal, because at least he didn't leave me with my first negative, but it's the principal of the thing. I don't think that all these newb bidders should even be allowed to leave feedback until they've done at least 50 transactions. Or at least, I should have the option as the seller to either refuse or accept it, before it appears on my record. A crazy idea, I know, but it pisses me off. I didn't deserve that neutral, and he knows it.
Not a USPS money order like I requested, so I had to go to my bank to cash it instead of going to the post office. This guy clearly failed all tests regarding his ability to follow directions while he was in school. I ship the item and fully expect to either have it returned to me with a request for a full refund, including what it cost him to ship it back to me, or to have an even bigger problem over it and have him claim that he never received it. Fortunately, neither one of those things happened, but this is how he thanks me for putting up with all his BS when he leaves his feedback for me on ebay:
Neutral: Thank you, but the card wasn't in mint condition.
The auction clearly stated that the card had 3 creases across the top, but was otherwise in mint condition. I really don't think that it was misleading.
So I replied with an equally ambivalent comment of my own in my profile:
Reply by irondraggon: You're welcome, the auction clearly stated there were 3 creases across the top.
I'm glad that I chose to wait until he left feedback for me, before I left any feedback for him. Normally, I'll leave positive feedback immediately upon receipt of payment, but in this case I had a bad feeling about the whole transaction, so I decided that I would wait and see what he said about me. So, tit for tat, he leaves a neutral for me, so he gets a neutral from me. I almost went ahead and left a neutral for him before he left any feedback for me anyway, so it wasn't exactly revenge. I was thinking about it anyway.
Neutral: Obviously didn't read the full description of the auction or the payment options.
Take that, you annoying little 18 feedback newb, #19 was your first neutral, and if you keep on putting other sellers through the same kinda crap that you put me through, you're gonna end up with your first negative soon.
This is the reason why I was reluctant to start selling on ebay with the same account that I've been using to buy on ebay for the past 4 years. Those darn newb buyers are the bane of every seller's existence. Just one newb bidder obviously doesn't read most of my listing, which was quite brief, and my perfect positive feedback record is forever tarnished with a neutral now.
I know it's not that big a deal, because at least he didn't leave me with my first negative, but it's the principal of the thing. I don't think that all these newb bidders should even be allowed to leave feedback until they've done at least 50 transactions. Or at least, I should have the option as the seller to either refuse or accept it, before it appears on my record. A crazy idea, I know, but it pisses me off. I didn't deserve that neutral, and he knows it.