Sniderman
06-07-2005, 09:51 AM
They've hounded us as we searched for chalices and rings. They've eaten us, breathed fire at us, and have generally made our questing lives a virtual Hell.
Now, it's time to pit them against each other.
Which group of videogame dragons has given you the most trouble over the years: Scortha, Goldfang, and Mythrog or Yorgle, Grundle, and Rhindle? If you were playing one game that featured both sets of dragons, which would give you more problems?
O2's dragons are slow, but fast when they have you in their sites. They cannot be killed - only stopped or turned away. And they breath fire, giving them the "ranged attack" advantage...
Atari's dragons are fast and they will chase you from screen to screen. However, hold the sword, and they can be killed. No fire breath to speak of, but if they have you cornered, they'll swallow you whole.
So, which group of lizard-bait is more feared? And why?
Now, it's time to pit them against each other.
Which group of videogame dragons has given you the most trouble over the years: Scortha, Goldfang, and Mythrog or Yorgle, Grundle, and Rhindle? If you were playing one game that featured both sets of dragons, which would give you more problems?
O2's dragons are slow, but fast when they have you in their sites. They cannot be killed - only stopped or turned away. And they breath fire, giving them the "ranged attack" advantage...
Atari's dragons are fast and they will chase you from screen to screen. However, hold the sword, and they can be killed. No fire breath to speak of, but if they have you cornered, they'll swallow you whole.
So, which group of lizard-bait is more feared? And why?