Raedon
01-27-2003, 04:34 PM
They say it's louder, generates more heat, and in a gaming enviroment actually SLOWER then the ATI 9700 pro which it was suppose to obliterate. This is not good for Nvidia at all.
here are some in depth reviews:
20 page.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1779&p=1
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDIx
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,846356,00.asp
"For nVidia, GeForceFX represents a return to at the very least performance parity with ATI. For ATI however, Radeon 9700 Pro looks strong versus GeForceFX, and these results show just how much performance ground nVidia had lost to ATI when Radeon 9700 Pro first shipped."
here are some in depth reviews:
20 page.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1779&p=1
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDIx
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,846356,00.asp
"For nVidia, GeForceFX represents a return to at the very least performance parity with ATI. For ATI however, Radeon 9700 Pro looks strong versus GeForceFX, and these results show just how much performance ground nVidia had lost to ATI when Radeon 9700 Pro first shipped."