View Full Version : Xbox 360: what is the point
badinsults
12-29-2005, 03:07 AM
The Xbox 360 has been released, with much fanfare. My question is, why?
- It claims to have the largest amount of titles available for launch for any system. However, most games are just graphically upgraded (though only slightly) versions of games that appear on other consoles. The leap from Xbox to Xbox 360 certainly isn't the leap that the PS2 was over the PS1.
- The biggest excluve release is Perfect Dark Zero, which was greeted as being poor compared to Halo, or even the predecesor Goldeneye.
- Most of the EA sports games have features that were cut out
- The extreme shortage at launch indicates that they were having to rush to get this thing out on time.
- The Japanese launch was a failure. Their lackluster advertising campaign failed to raise awareness in Japan. Why did they even bother to release it there?
- The Xbox 360 is not backwards compatible. Their emulator fails in many respects and it will likely take a long time before all games work.
- There is no Halo game for launch. Come on, that is like Nintendo releasing a system without a Mario game at launch (yes, I'm looking at the Gamecube)
- It does not support HD-DVD. If Microsoft is so adamant for this format, why don't they throw it in their system? Sony's blu ray format will certainly gain the upper hand in that battle if the PS3 has blu ray standard
- What are the upcoming games? Aside from the obvious Halo 3 and other releases like FF11 and Too Human, what is next? There is almost no hype for upcoming titles.
- HDTV may be the future, but it certainly isn't here yet. Having mindblowing graphics is one thing, but when you degrade the experience for people with standard tvs, you are not going to please many people outside the hardcore base.
- Online gaming is all the rage, but there is limited reach if you have to pay money to subscribe to it. Do you think Starcraft would have been such a big online game if people had to pay for it? I think not. Nintendo knows this, and offers a free service.
- Having a hard drive and non-hard drive console is quite a bizarre move. It was standard on the xbox, and was certainly one of the best features on the xbox.
- Rare. What the crap Rare, really. Rare was the crutch of the N64, but now they put out mediocre titles that no one cares about.
- Why did teh Xbox 360 start at such a low price? Why sell at a loss when there is such a shortage now that you could sell at cost and still sell out the console. The loss leader attitude will eventually piss off investors.
- The Xbox 360 is definitely aimed at hardcore gamers. However, probably half of those hardcore gamers will also get PS3s. This spreads around the money spent on games. They need to expand beyond the hardcore group, but it doesn't appear that they are interested in doing this.
Griking
12-29-2005, 09:06 AM
Huh, did you say something?
Lothars
12-29-2005, 09:17 AM
I honestly agree with almost all that you listed there, but the one thing that is a big thing for me is the market place with the older games, which really interest me more than any other game for the system, but it's just one of those things
we will see how it ends up doing in the next couple months.
Flack
12-29-2005, 09:51 AM
I wish I had the energy to respond to every one of those points. Maybe after breakfast.
Dangerboy
12-29-2005, 10:17 AM
It claims to have the largest amount of titles....Xbox to Xbox 360 certainly isn't the leap that the PS2 was over the PS1.
1. It doesn't matter what the titles are, it still had the largest launch day library with a really nice depth of titles. Sony didn't even have a 1st party game at PS2 launch. Heck, N64 only had 2 games!
And last I check, the PS2 wasn't exactly leaps and bounds over PS1 games when it launched; no new system is. The system doesn't show it's real potential until the 2nd wave of games, when the developers have had plenty of time to kick the system around.
The biggest excluve release is Perfect Dark Zero, which was greeted as being poor compared to Halo, or even the predecesor Goldeneye.
True, but it acts more of a coffee table conversation revelation. "Yeah, Rare is now with Microsoft...hey...isn't the Final Fantasy Guy now with them?"
- Most of the EA sports games have features that were cut out
Absolutely true. Except this is EAs fault and their's alone, not Microsoft nor the 360s. 2K Sports has the brains to actually make a more complete basketball game....why couldn't EA?
- The extreme shortage at launch indicates that they were having to rush to get this thing out on time.
Gee, kinda like the PS2.
- The Japanese launch was a failure. Their lackluster advertising campaign failed to raise awareness in Japan. Why did they even bother to release it there?
A US deck in a Japanese Dominated market. Not even the 3DO stood a chance, and that actually had anime titles. At least they tried. Sometimes showing you're willing to give something a shot is more impressive than actually succeeding, especially with the odds stacked so high against you.
- The Xbox 360 is not backwards compatible. Their emulator fails in many respects and it will likely take a long time before all games work.
They said it was compaitble with top selling games. They never said all of them. Also, Sony released a new PS2 in Japan that doesn't even play certain PS2 games, including Tekken 5. Why bash a system that can't play a different systems' games, but not bash a system that can't play its own games?
- There is no Halo game for launch. Come on, that is like Nintendo releasing a system without a Mario game at launch (yes, I'm looking at the Gamecube)
Halo 1 was their "taking a chance game" that turned out brilliantly. You're bitching about everything being rushed and not done right, and now you want to wonder why Microsoft didn't shovelware the #1 bread winner out the door? Please.
- It does not support HD-DVD. If Microsoft is so adamant for this format, why don't they throw it in their system? Sony's blu ray format will certainly gain the upper hand in that battle if the PS3 has blu ray standard
Microsoft I can't answer for. As for Blue Ray? Just another color of disc that won't be able to played in a Sony machine 4 months after using the deck.
- What are the upcoming games? Aside from the obvious Halo 3 and other releases like FF11 and Too Human, what is next? There is almost no hype for upcoming titles.
Hype usually detracts from a game, like how Halo 2 (which is a great game) is suddenly shit because it didn't live up to
'what people were expecting'. The best way to make a splash is to have no expectations, that way players aren't comparing reality to their visions.
See also MGS2: Sons of Liberty, Mario Sunshine, etc...
I'm personally looking forward to Burnout 3, Dead or Alive 4, Elder Scrolls 4, both Myst Walker games...etc...etc...
- HDTV may be the future, but it certainly isn't here yet. Having mindblowing graphics is one thing, but when you degrade the experience for people with standard tvs, you are not going to please many people outside the hardcore base.
It's called progress.
Last I checked the government was going to actually help people upgrade to high def TVs in a few years, since that will be the new broadcasting standard. Nothing like getting an early jump, eh?
Your comment also applies to the PS2 and XBox 1...people using AV cables on their tube TVs have a worse picture than I do with my Wega and Component cables.
When AV cables first started coming out, with RF being the standard, would you have been making this same complaint?
Online gaming is all the rage, but there is limited reach if you have to pay money to subscribe to it. Do you think Starcraft would have been such a big online game if people had to pay for it? I think not. Nintendo knows this, and offers a free service.
You can't compare PC online to console online. Live is well worth the yearly fee just for all the neat bells and whistles you can do with it. I think I played online with my PS2 once for Kill Zone, and haven't done it since.
Second, both PSP and DS have free online attachments because they have no true base of operation. No one is going to pay for a service they can only use where a wireless router / adapter is.
Plus, the Revolution online download programs apparently aren't free, but fee based in someway. The only reason PS2 is online for free is because Sony washed their hands of everything. Microsoft handles everything with a Live logo on it.
- Having a hard drive and non-hard drive console is quite a bizarre move. It was standard on the xbox, and was certainly one of the best features on the xbox.
See PS2 - with and wthout modem...or save function...
For some people who don't want to play online, the $100 they saved went to 2 games, a game and a memory card, or more controllers, etc.
Microsoft gave people a choice, and seeing how Cores sold just as well as Premiums, the gamble worked.
- Rare. What the crap Rare, really. Rare was the crutch of the N64, but now they put out mediocre titles that no one cares about.
Burned out. Plus didn't a few of the original staff leave? The same is true about Square...the current staff in charge of FF have no clue what made FF...well....FF. I haven't touched a Square game in years.
- Why did the Xbox 360 start at such a low price? Why sell at a loss when there is such a shortage now that you could sell at cost and still sell out the console. The loss leader attitude will eventually piss off investors.
Nintendo is the only company I know of that can sell decks at cost / or for a profit. Console Comapnies make their profit on the software both on the consumer side and on the royalty side. Sometimes you need to take a loss to make a profit.
What would piss you off more as an investor? That you're losing money shipping decks out the door, building a huge userbase that will come back and buy up the software and accessories...or watching your investment dollars sink because the hardware is too expensive for the mainstream consumer (See: 3DO).
This also contradicts your earlier statement about the TV / HD TV...the $180 Microsoft loses per deck is back in the consumers hands, which can be put towards that shiny new HD-TV. I've had several customers ask for the make/model of the Samsung models Microsoft uses on their kiosks because it helps make the system shine.
With rumors of the PS3 at $500, and games at $80, that's already turning a lot of people off, except the truly 'hardcore' sony fans.
- The Xbox 360 is definitely aimed at hardcore gamers. However, probably half of those hardcore gamers will also get PS3s. This spreads around the money spent on games. They need to expand beyond the hardcore group, but it doesn't appear that they are interested in doing this.
Actually, it was aimed at every gamer. Any $400 system that has a killer old school 2D game included on the hard drive (Hexic is addictive) as well as supports killer 3D games like Call of Duty, AND has a beautiful, easy to use online service that keeps track of damn near everything, plus options like custom soundtracks and what have you, has to be doing something right.
Dollars to donuts the same original post will be made when the PS3 comes out, just with the appropiate names changed.
esquire
12-29-2005, 10:25 AM
Rather than respond to all your questions, I'll simply ask one in return:
Do you actually own a 360, and if so, what games have you bought (not played at a kiosk) for it?
fishsandwich
12-29-2005, 10:39 AM
I agree that the quality of the launch titles were less than overwhelming. The 360's complex "multiple-core" architecture will mean a high learning curve. Games that take advantage of it will come eventually and really show what the 360 can do.
I agree that the harddrive/no harddrive thing is silly.
That's about it.
XianXi
12-29-2005, 10:55 AM
- They said it was compaitble with top selling games. They never said all of them. Also, Sony released a new PS2 in Japan that doesn't even play certain PS2 games, including Tekken 5. Why bash a system that can't play a different systems' games, but not bash a system that can't play its own games?
You are comparing an American released console to a Japan only release console? Sony doesn't really care what they release in Japan, only in America where it counts since we are their biggest market.
-With rumors of the PS3 at $500, and games at $80, that's already turning a lot of people off, except the truly 'hardcore' sony fans.
If it's fully backwards compatible like they says it's gonna be I think $500 is a bargain for a console that can play PS1, PS2 and PS3 games and DVDs, CDs etc. Not to mention that those are around the same prices as the 360 had upon release. PLus with Sony you may get a few bugs in the 1st release of the PS3 but at least no crashing.
Dangerboy
12-29-2005, 11:09 AM
You are comparing an American released console to a Japan only release console? Sony doesn't really care what they release in Japan, only in America where it counts since we are their biggest market.
They cared so much there was a class action lawsuit for several models of American PS2s that scratched CDs, overheated, or flat out didn't work.
2nd, if they don't care about their own home market...who are they going to care about?
Not to mention that those are around the same prices as the 360 had upon release
Um...$500 is a LOT more than $400, especially with what comes with the 360 (headset, component cables, live, etc).
And $80 is still $20- $30 more than current 360 stuff.
That's like saying $1,000 is around thesame price as $800.
Maybe I don't make enough money to consider a $200 difference "close enough".
XianXi
12-29-2005, 11:37 AM
Around meaning upwards of $400. And we still don't know what is going to be included with the PS3. $500 is not even a set price yet it may come with 2 controllers and some other stuff, who knows. We will have to wait and see.
hezeuschrist
12-29-2005, 11:52 AM
Way to fall to the Sony hype machine hook, line, and sinker.
I'm sorry, but $500 is way too fucking much for a console. Unless it can pleasure me physically, it's too much. Will I pay it? Depends on if theres anything I want to play at launch, and if there is I'll pay it and be bitter about it.
Kutaragi and his band of merry assholes are marketing geniuses. He's going to come out and tout the PS3 as being the greatest advancement in technology since the invention of the microprocessor and say that everyone will want to work overtime just to own the Jesus Machine (tm). Then when they launch it at "only" $500 people won't crucify them for it.
Not to mention with the $400 360 bundle you get everything but a game that you would need to have the full potential of the system and enjoy it's entire online experience. If the PS3 is $500 for the equivalent of the 360 Core system then they're REALLY way out of line.
esquire
12-29-2005, 12:19 PM
If it's fully backwards compatible like they says it's gonna be I think $500 is a bargain for a console that can play PS1, PS2 and PS3 games and DVDs, CDs etc.
Whoa there! Whoever said its going to 100% compatible, especially with PS2 and PS1 games? The PS2 alone is not 100% compatible with PS1 games. Plus Sony has already admitted that the PS3 will not be 100% compatible with PS2 games.
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:39 am Post subject: PS3 Not 100% Backwards Compatible?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Somewhat surprisingly, SCEI’s Reiko Sakamoto admitted not only that the list of problem games may grow but also that the imminent PS3 will not necessarily be 100% backwards compatible. You heard it here first.
(Via IDG News Service)
Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (SCEI) is launching a limited edition version of its PlayStation 2 to boost holiday sales in Japan. It comes with a special surprise: the inability to play some games smoothly.
SCEI has published a list of nine PlayStation 2 games and 38 PlayStation games that run into problems on the new console. The SCPH-75000 will be available in Japan from Nov. 23, and is modeled on the slim-line PlayStation 2 that SCEI put on sale just under a year ago. In launching the new model, SCEI is using an oft-employed sales-boosting tactic of making a console available in a different color — silver in this case — for a limited period.
However, this time changes made inside the console are causing trouble.
"We believe multiple factors are responsible," said Reiko Sakamoto, a spokeswoman for SCEI in Tokyo. The latest console uses a new chipset — the chip that sits between the main processor and the rest of the device — and changes in that chip coupled with the way some software is programmed are believed to be causing the glitches, she said. The problems are largely screen hang-ups during certain parts of the game but also include glitches such as the slow saving of game data onto memory cards.
The problems were discovered when SCEI began compatibility testing of the new consoles with the roughly 8,000 games that have been released for the PlayStation and PlayStation 2 consoles in Japan. Mass production of the consoles had already begun at the time.
As testing isn't complete the list could become longer. SCEI wouldn't specify how many titles remain to be tested but said "most of" the software testing has been completed.
Looking ahead to the PlayStation 3, which SCEI plans to launch in the first half of next year, Sakamoto said that SCEI remains committed to backwards compatibility with existing titles on the new machine.
"It's hard to say the PlayStation 3 will be 100 percent backwards compatible but as we said earlier this year we aim to make it so as much as possible," Sakamoto said.
The latest promotion comes at an important time for the company: ahead of the holiday sales season in Japan and just under three weeks before Microsoft is due to launch its Xbox 360 console in Japan. SCEI hasn't detailed an international launch for the console, which will cost ¥19,800 ($171) in Japan.”
Shamelessly stolen from this thread (http://www.digitpress.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=73117&highlight=ps3)
mikeetler
12-29-2005, 12:25 PM
Last I checked the government was going to actually help people upgrade to high def TVs in a few years, since that will be the new broadcasting standard. Nothing like getting an early jump, eh?
Slightly OT but you're way off on this. The current plan is a complete switch to digital transmission from analog in 2008. Congress is working on a way to get government subsidized digital to analog converters to people that don't want or can't afford to upgrade to HDTV sets.
Joker T
12-29-2005, 12:29 PM
You don't have to buy one you know LOL
esquire
12-29-2005, 12:36 PM
You don't have to buy one you know LOL
My thoughts exactly. That's the reason why I made my original post asking if the poster even had the system to begin with.
Seriously do we need another topic that attempts to justify why someone doesn't have "Console X"? If you don't like it, don't buy it. No need to pile on other peoples' financial decisions and gaming choices. Personally, when I see threads like these, I see them nothing more than sour grapes.
Perhaps I should start my own thread:
"Another thread bashing Console X: What's the Point?"
XianXi
12-29-2005, 12:57 PM
I wouldnt mind getting one but I need to fill my Neo Geo AES fill first. I'll let my brother buy the PS3 since he's 18 now and I bought all the other consoles. LOL
leorange
12-29-2005, 03:18 PM
In case anyone reads this, my Xbox 360 thread is an experiment. Much like the Truth Media segments on Something Awful. I want to see the reaction. I wish that people could come up with interesting topics, but it isn't happening anymore.
-_-
Push Upstairs
12-29-2005, 03:26 PM
Talk about a non-interesting topic....
unwinddesign
12-29-2005, 04:45 PM
This topic: what is the point?
PapaStu
12-29-2005, 06:20 PM
I could answer most everything, much like dangerboy did, but he said almost everything I'd have said. However, this one will get a little extra response
- There is no Halo game for launch. Come on, that is like Nintendo releasing a system without a Mario game at launch (yes, I'm looking at the Gamecube)
Why isnt there a Halo? Because as said since LAST YEAR by numerous Xbox execs, Halo 3 will launch the SAME day as the PS3. They want to do their best to make people ignore the competition, and what better way to do that than to release their flagship game at the launch of the arch enemies new system. Halo 2 was a great game and yes, it did have some faults but Bungie did good by it. Go back and play Halo, pay attention to the game because if you do you'll see how rushed it really was. The story modes levels were often enlogated versions of the same thing 2 or 3 times, and if they wernt that, then it was a level that you'd already played (just now your playing it backwards) and that happened purely because MS rushed Bungie to have something... anything for the launch. If they did that again, the flagship title would be run out of town and MS would only be screwed over. They arnt stupid, they know where their bread winners are.
le geek
12-29-2005, 06:27 PM
I too, do not think a football is a very good Christmas present.
Oh, I'm sorry what was the question again? :P
I dunno, it's like every console launch, if you buy early you get a few cool games at a premium price and then wait a good 6+ months for more good games that start to really take advantage of the system. Of the three I've bought at or near launch (Dreamcast, PS2, Nintendo DS) in hindsight I wish I had waited.
I'll be waiting to see what Nintendo and Sony come out with and then hopefully "hold out" until the first price drops. I have plenty of Cube and Xbox games to tide me over, and most of the games I want to purchase in the near future are portable anyway...
Too early to tell IMO...
Cheers,
Ben
kirin jensen
12-29-2005, 07:21 PM
You all misunderstand.
It's an attempt by Microsoft to solve the equation:
f+$-(x+y)=0
Where:
f=fool
$=his money
x=Xbox360
y=number of games said fool can be suckered into buying
and
0=the number of seconds before $ is parted from f by buying x and y.
Fank you veddy much.
CreamSoda
12-29-2005, 11:27 PM
Sounds like somebody is pissed they didn't get a 360, no offense I'm not trying to start a big fight or anything. But I was the same way, until I got the system for Christmas. My opinion definetly changed!!!
Graphics aren't above current gen? WTF! Even on my standard 27 inch RCA the graphics look better then anything PS2/Xbox could ever dream of handling!
EA sports titles being rushed? Is there ever a time when this is different? LOL
I would reply to the giant text wall, but it's not really worth it.
So far the 360 lives up to the hype for me.
As for Perfect Dark being the flagship title, I would agree. Does it live up to Goldeneye? No! Does any FPS? IMO nope! haha/ Anyway this game is better then Halo, IMO. And thats saying ALOT.
comrade
12-29-2005, 11:37 PM
Jesus Machine (tm)
This will now, and forever, be the PS3's nickname to me.
badinsults
12-30-2005, 12:41 AM
Pff, you guys take things too seriously. This was a joke. Half the threads in this forum are in the vein of this one. The things I listed are derived from information that I got purely from this forum, as I have done almost no real research on the Xbox 360.
Once Too Human is out, and I am out of school, the XBox 360 will be mine. I only care about the games. I don't have the money to buy Xbox 360 right now, and there won't be any games out that interest me until Too Human is out. I really have no opinion on the Xbox 360 right now, as I have never played it, much like how I never have played an Xbox.
Blackjax
12-30-2005, 12:42 AM
Ya know, seriously, there is only one thing I can think of to say about this entire thread.
:deadhorse: :deadhorse: :deadhorse:
Dangerboy's exactly right. This exact same round of arguments will be made when the PS3 comes out and when the Revolution comes out...
I don't see this thread ending well either...
Push Upstairs
12-30-2005, 02:34 AM
Pff, you guys take things too seriously. This was a joke. Half the threads in this forum are in the vein of this one. The things I listed are derived from information that I got purely from this forum, as I have done almost no real research on the Xbox 360.
What exactly was supposed to be "funny"? That you made a thread just like a ton of others in this forum or is it funny that you made a cookie cutter "Anti- ____" thread out of info you collected?
These are the same kind of comments made at every video game launch. Usually by someone that doesnt own the system.
AKay
Bronty-2
12-31-2005, 08:06 PM
I'm sorry, but $500 is way too fucking much for a console. Unless it can pleasure me physically, it's too much.
My thoughts exactly LOL
MrSmiley381
01-01-2006, 01:49 AM
Lawdy, what an annoying thread.
I was not impressed by the Xbox 360. If it gets a REAL RPG, and a REAL fighting game, I'll love it. I'll give it time. I don't like the Xbox 360 launch titles, but that's just me. THe people that piss me off are the Xbox 360 fanboys, not so much the system itself. I might give DoA 4 a shot.
I've been pleased as punch over my regular Xbox. I loved it the day I first fired one up. The 360 is a natural for me because it will allow me to continue to play certain franchises, not because of false hopes that it might do amazing things that other consoles can't. I'm not "hyped" on a 360. I saw one in our local shop, I picked it up, examined it from all angles, tested a few games, put down the controller and walked away from it. I had already decided that eventual ownership was in the cards before I saw the machine. I can honestly say that with the 360 I haven't seen the same level of mania that the PS2 brought forth when IT launched. People went retarded the Christmas that that thing launched.
zerohero
01-01-2006, 01:55 PM
The Xbox 360 has been released, with much fanfare. My question is, why?
- It claims to have the largest amount of titles available for launch for any system. However, most games are just graphically upgraded (though only slightly) versions of games that appear on other consoles. The leap from Xbox to Xbox 360 certainly isn't the leap that the PS2 was over the PS1.
- The biggest excluve release is Perfect Dark Zero, which was greeted as being poor compared to Halo, or even the predecesor Goldeneye.
- Most of the EA sports games have features that were cut out
- The extreme shortage at launch indicates that they were having to rush to get this thing out on time.
- The Japanese launch was a failure. Their lackluster advertising campaign failed to raise awareness in Japan. Why did they even bother to release it there?
- The Xbox 360 is not backwards compatible. Their emulator fails in many respects and it will likely take a long time before all games work.
- There is no Halo game for launch. Come on, that is like Nintendo releasing a system without a Mario game at launch (yes, I'm looking at the Gamecube)
- It does not support HD-DVD. If Microsoft is so adamant for this format, why don't they throw it in their system? Sony's blu ray format will certainly gain the upper hand in that battle if the PS3 has blu ray standard
- What are the upcoming games? Aside from the obvious Halo 3 and other releases like FF11 and Too Human, what is next? There is almost no hype for upcoming titles.
- HDTV may be the future, but it certainly isn't here yet. Having mindblowing graphics is one thing, but when you degrade the experience for people with standard tvs, you are not going to please many people outside the hardcore base.
- Online gaming is all the rage, but there is limited reach if you have to pay money to subscribe to it. Do you think Starcraft would have been such a big online game if people had to pay for it? I think not. Nintendo knows this, and offers a free service.
- Having a hard drive and non-hard drive console is quite a bizarre move. It was standard on the xbox, and was certainly one of the best features on the xbox.
- Rare. What the crap Rare, really. Rare was the crutch of the N64, but now they put out mediocre titles that no one cares about.
- Why did the Xbox 360 start at such a low price? Why sell at a loss when there is such a shortage now that you could sell at cost and still sell out the console. The loss leader attitude will eventually piss off investors.
- The Xbox 360 is definitely aimed at hardcore gamers. However, probably half of those hardcore gamers will also get PS3s. This spreads around the money spent on games. They need to expand beyond the hardcore group, but it doesn't appear that they are interested in doing this.
Dude, I basically did a thread exactly like this a long time before Xbox launched.
zerohero
01-01-2006, 01:58 PM
These are the same kind of comments made at every video game launch. Usually by someone that doesnt own the system.
AKay
Negative,
I told my dad when I was like 12 or so, to wait on buying the N64 and to get a Playstation. When I turned 16, and got the thing myself, I still thought it sucked. The only reason why I got it was to beat Zelda 64.
DonMarco
01-01-2006, 08:24 PM
I had $400 burning a hole in my pocket, and at the register it seemed like a good enough idea. Making my friends jealous and blowing all that money is a win-win situation. Now I won't be able to buy that silk screen press I was saving up for... I'll be fine, I guess. I'll get a HD TV in a couple years, now, I guess. A nice 27" one.
Game-wise, there are four good games, and only one I would call a "decent launch title". Man, I can't wait for WoW.
(that good enough?)
Raven1280
01-02-2006, 01:22 AM
Xbox 360: what is the point ..... to make Microsoft more money!
jonnyutah
01-02-2006, 03:43 PM
this is amusing, Teeny bop talk! lol. I'm jsut a fan of content. What's the point? we'll basictly you mite ask that question about ps3 becasue it will be much of the same. Actualy I'm quite surprised by how close the tech specs of the two ssytemes are.
I don't know if you follow the pc video card market but if you don't, there are two main competitors: ATI and nvidia. I don't doubt that m$ will lable 360 as the most powerful even after the ps3 releases just because they are so similar in terms of hardware power.
You haven't seen true 360 software yet. youv'e seem tech demo's converted into launch games and pc ports. you are just seeign hd ports. 360 games didn't even begin to take advantage of the mathematic calculations these beasts are capable of, the geometry of multi core processing...not to mension the hd evolution of 2d games. yeh, lets not forget them :) I imagine with the extra ram and speed we can expect to see the evolution of 2d games that come out with guns blazing running super fast like an anime in HD...
to me, so far 360 is more interesting than ps3, why? more interesting controller that feels comfy, fun games and it's out now ...pretty simple :) plus.... Tenchu 360
esquire
01-02-2006, 11:44 PM
Hey Jonny Utah, are you related in any way to Shane Falco or Ted "Theodore" Logan?
Jasoco
01-03-2006, 01:03 AM
Having finally seen and touched and used a 360 in person after having wanted one really really badly for months I can finally say..
Meh.
I wasn't impressed. I am sad, I was not impressed. Maybe it was the one game that interested me on the demo disc was Kameo and it made me realize I don't want old style Rare games anymore (I'd prefer remakes of Banjo or the Conker remake.). Kameo is just not appealing to me now. It looked nice, but something about it turned me off.
Or maybe it was the lack of a demo of Perfect Dark on the disc. WTF? No demo of the ONE game that would have turned my "Meh" into a "That's somewhat cool"on the disc?
And all the rest of the games demo'd and released and coming up (INCLUDING Halo 3) don't appeal to me at all.
So meh. Meh. Big fat meh.
For one thing, the one big thing the 360 has going for it is HD. I have no HD TV. Screw HD. Meh.
And another is a DVD player. I have 5 already. MEH.
Another is the controller. I was told I'd like the controller. But I have now used it. It's better than the S controller, but it is STILL HORRIBLE. I'd prefer the DUKE. MEH again!
I'm sorely disappointed. Disappointed I say. :/
Oh well, I saved myself $400 by taking that trip to Target.
Man, it feels good to not want a console. Wow. I can't think of one game that could or would come out for it that would make me want it. Except Perfect Dark Zero, and they blew THAT by not including it on the disc! It's not there! I looked!
So... Meh.
swlovinist
01-03-2006, 10:24 AM
To all the 360 people out there that are not impressed...remember the PS2 launch? It was months before a solid A+ title came out that blew everyone away. The system is only over a month old and has not even scratched what it is capable of. Launch games do not do the system justice, wait for E3 to show what the system can really do.
segarocks30
01-03-2006, 10:43 AM
The Jesus Machine, thats good.Here's the slogan
"Your playing with Christ, Sony PS3."
People are forgetting the other features of the XBOX360 for the price of 300.
It can connect to a media center pc like i have it hooked up.
The multimedia demos and trailers you can download.
The xbox live arcade. You can connect a digital camera to it, stream music from your ipod or a computer while playing.
DOA is a must have game unless you absolutely dont like fighting games.
AKay
blissfulnoise
01-03-2006, 02:14 PM
Having received my Xbox 360 as a Christmas present I can say this one, indisputable fact:
Xbox Live via the Xbox 360 is the single greatest method of playing games online that's available today.
That is all.