NinjaJoey23
09-30-2006, 01:44 AM
Not sure if this has been discussed previously, but in any case...
What do you guys think about the "exchange" of feedback?
Many sellers explicitly state that they will not award positive feedback untilit has been received. I don't understand this because once a seller has received payment, the buyer's part of the bargain has been fulfilled. I think that at that point the seller should award feedback. I think that this shows good faith and sets a more positive atmosphere for the whole process. I almost always award feedback after payment is received.
I see so many auctions that read similarly:
"BUYER AGREES TO ALL THE FOLLOWING TERMS BY PLACING A BID OR BUYING IT NOW:
PAYPAL IS ACCEPTED AND IS DUE WITHIN 24 HOURS NO EXCUSES.
MONEY ORDER IS DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS.
PAYPAL IS ACCEPTED FROM AND ONLY SHIPS TO THE CONFIRMED ADDRESS.
IF YOU HAVE A FEEDBACK SCORE OF ZERO OR PRIVATE DO NOT BID PRIOR TO CONTACTING ME OR YOUR BID WILL BE PULLED AND YOU WILL BE BLOCKED. THIS DOES INCLUDE BUY IT NOW."
(This is a direct quotation)
The last part is especially funny, since if you Buy It Now, it doesn't matter what your feedback is. You're paying for it right there. No wait.
I understand that sellers are afraid of receiving negatives and then not being able to give a "retribution" negative. But usually, if the buyer paid promptly after the auction closed, was then dissatisfied in some way and left the seller a negative, that doesn't warrant a retributive negative. Maybe I am just being naive, but the logic of this loses me. It is as if to say "Well, if you have something bad to say about me, then I also have something bad to say about you."
I have read a few books on eBay selling and powerselling techniques and whatnot. All of the ones I have read suggest awarding feedback as soon as payment is received. In short, I agree.
Thoughts?
What do you guys think about the "exchange" of feedback?
Many sellers explicitly state that they will not award positive feedback untilit has been received. I don't understand this because once a seller has received payment, the buyer's part of the bargain has been fulfilled. I think that at that point the seller should award feedback. I think that this shows good faith and sets a more positive atmosphere for the whole process. I almost always award feedback after payment is received.
I see so many auctions that read similarly:
"BUYER AGREES TO ALL THE FOLLOWING TERMS BY PLACING A BID OR BUYING IT NOW:
PAYPAL IS ACCEPTED AND IS DUE WITHIN 24 HOURS NO EXCUSES.
MONEY ORDER IS DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS.
PAYPAL IS ACCEPTED FROM AND ONLY SHIPS TO THE CONFIRMED ADDRESS.
IF YOU HAVE A FEEDBACK SCORE OF ZERO OR PRIVATE DO NOT BID PRIOR TO CONTACTING ME OR YOUR BID WILL BE PULLED AND YOU WILL BE BLOCKED. THIS DOES INCLUDE BUY IT NOW."
(This is a direct quotation)
The last part is especially funny, since if you Buy It Now, it doesn't matter what your feedback is. You're paying for it right there. No wait.
I understand that sellers are afraid of receiving negatives and then not being able to give a "retribution" negative. But usually, if the buyer paid promptly after the auction closed, was then dissatisfied in some way and left the seller a negative, that doesn't warrant a retributive negative. Maybe I am just being naive, but the logic of this loses me. It is as if to say "Well, if you have something bad to say about me, then I also have something bad to say about you."
I have read a few books on eBay selling and powerselling techniques and whatnot. All of the ones I have read suggest awarding feedback as soon as payment is received. In short, I agree.
Thoughts?