Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: New York Senate passes game bill

  1. #1
    Bell (Level 8) 7th lutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,798
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Default New York Senate passes game bill

    http://www.gamespot.com/news/6171292.html

    Last month New York state Senators Andrew Lanza and Martin Golden promised that they would be introducing legislation that would "crackdown" on violent games. That bill surfaced last week, breezing through the Senate in just four days. Now it moves on to the state Assembly, where it must again be approved before it can go before the governor to be signed into law.

    As expected, the bill would establish an advisory council to appraise the effectiveness and accuracy of the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) rating system, as well as parent-teacher antiviolence awareness program. While Lanza and Golden originally said the parent-teacher program would be formed to work on issues related to violence in games, the text of the bill makes no mention of games in that program's duties. According to the bill, the parent-teacher program is being established "in order to recognize and appropriately respond to students at risk for developing a propensity toward violent conduct."

    The bill would also make rating labels mandatory on all games sold in the state, with punishments established for anyone selling or renting a game at retail "in contravention of the rating affixed thereto." On the mandatory labeling part of the law, no exception is specifically made for digitally distributed games or used games that predate the ESRB.

    If passed, the ratings restrictions would take effect January 1, 2008, while the advisory council and parent-teacher program would be created immediately.

  2. #2
    Pear (Level 6) chicnstu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,358
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Default

    On the mandatory labeling part of the law, no exception is specifically made for digitally distributed games or used games that predate the ESRB.
    So pawn shops can't sell the older games without ratings after January 1, 2008? Is this only in New York? Do flea markets count?
    "Tell her you want to slide a hot throbbing cartridge in her warm tight console port. And if it starts blinking and flashing to just slide it back out and blow on it a little."--Sothy

  3. #3
    Kirby (Level 13) Push Upstairs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    somewhere between the past and the future
    Posts
    5,464
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Sounds like a total waste of taxpayer dollars with that "parent-teacher" thing added in an attempt to make sure nobody will vote against it.

    Possibility is infinity! You must be satisfied!

    You just can't handle my jawusumness responces. -The Sizz



  4. #4
    Pretzel (Level 4) coreys429's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kelso, WA
    Posts
    840
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Cool

    Well this doesn't stop the selling the games on ebay.

  5. #5
    Great Puma (Level 12) heybtbm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,338
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Xbox LIVE
    The Shamemaker
    PSN
    heybtbm
    Steam
    The_Shamemaker

    Default

    I'm impressed that New York has solved all their problems and finally have time for issues such as this.
    "One of the ways I gauge a DS game is by recharges. "...Tycho (Penny Arcade)

  6. #6
    Lightgunner Custom rank graphic
    Cryomancer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Southern Central WI
    Posts
    3,748
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Xbox LIVE
    Cryomancer

    Default

    So it will be the teacher's job to inform about videogame ratings now? Brilliant plan.

    By their own logic, the teachers will have to play the violent games, and therefore will become violent themselves and shoot up the school. Oh wait, none of these people play the games, they just get told what to think about them.

  7. #7
    Kirby (Level 13) diskoboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Nash-vegas, TN.
    Posts
    5,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Xbox LIVE
    Diskoboy74

    Default

    New York and California (politicians) are all fucked in the head.

    California especially. But it makes me so happy to see how much of a police state NY has become, ever since Bloomberg got elected.

  8. #8
    Kirby (Level 13) Push Upstairs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    somewhere between the past and the future
    Posts
    5,464
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryomancer View Post
    So it will be the teacher's job to inform about videogame ratings now? Brilliant plan.

    By their own logic, the teachers will have to play the violent games, and therefore will become violent themselves and shoot up the school. Oh wait, none of these people play the games, they just get told what to think about them.
    My understanding of it is that the Parent-Teacher thing is supposed to help address how little Johnny is acting at school and has little to do with the ratings nonsense....that is why I don't like it's inclusion. If anyone doesn't vote for it some politicians are going to scream "Hey, you don't want to protect kids!"

    When will people realize that 99% of politicians don't care about you or your kids, they just want your vote to stay in office.

    Possibility is infinity! You must be satisfied!

    You just can't handle my jawusumness responces. -The Sizz



  9. #9
    ServBot (Level 11) GarrettCRW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    3,700
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Xbox LIVE
    GarrettCRW
    PSN
    GarrettCRW

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Push Upstairs View Post
    When will people realize that 99% of politicians don't care about you or your kids, they just want your vote to stay in office.
    QFT. And since everyone in NY's State Senate and Assembly are scared shitless that they'll be accused of being "against families" in the next election, this will fly through any legislative chamber that it gets introduced into. (The same thing goes for being perceived as being "against the troops", for instance.) What most fail to realize, though, is that laws such as these cause government to shift from being there to protect the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to existing to control the lives of the people.
    Webmaster of the Cartoon Review Website!
    http://www.cartoonreviewsite.com

    My sale thread

  10. #10
    Apple (Level 5) 8-bitNesMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Another Castle
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chicnstu View Post
    So pawn shops can't sell the older games without ratings after January 1, 2008? Is this only in New York? Do flea markets count?
    I intrepreted it to mean that said games would not fall under the provisions of the new law. In other words, an older game or a digitally distributed game would not have to have the new warning label.
    "What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets! But enough talk... Have at you!"

    My feedback thread: http://www.digitpress.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93213

  11. #11
    ServBot (Level 11) s1lence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Minnesota : Bitterville
    Posts
    3,159
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Xbox LIVE
    Mightymango

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7th lutz View Post

    If passed, the ratings restrictions would take effect January 1, 2008, while the advisory council and parent-teacher program would be created immediately.

    Great just what people need is more fucking councils and programs. Yay let spend taxpayers money in more retarded ways. How about they make a program for the removal of Pigeons.....oh wait they have done that to. Maybe a program to see if rectal bleeding contributes to pollution?
    Part of the #Vbender Crew


  12. #12
    Insert Coin (Level 0)
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    81
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    I know this an unpopular opinion 'round these parts, but I don't see a major problem here. There is a big difference between censorship and enforcement of ratings and I think as long as the latter doesn't impede on the former it's a good thing. 12 and 13 year old kids for the most part shouldn't be playing Grand Theft Auto 3. Sure there are some mature enough to handle these themes just like there are some kids that age who are mature enough to watch Goodfellas or the Departed. But there are just as many who aren't and should stick to something lighter for a while.

    Parents need to make the right choices and become involved in what their kids do. Honestly, I think most parents who do that probably have a stable, healthy relationship with their kids and those kids aren't going to be serious risks anyway. The problem is that the kid's who psychologically are at risk to do something drastic don't often have that stable parental relationship, therefore their parents don't care what they play and won't monitor their kids choices. Unfortunately, that means a strictly enforced rating system is the only way to keep games that these kids shouldn't play out of their hands. I know it sucks sometimes to have society's feeble dangling at the public teat, but if it makes for a safer, more civilized society so be it. So long as it doesn't infringe on my personal rights to beat up virtual hookers I'm OK with that.

    As far as the teacher-parent council is concerned...ehh. I don't know that it could accomplish much. But I do know that when I student taught I had a 12 year old student who talked nonstop about GTA, only taking breaks to pretend he was a sniper looking out the window. I suppose having some sort of group effort to monitor that kind of behavior and discuss it with other teachers and parents may have been helpful. As it was, any concerns I raised regarding the issue were on deaf ears because I was the only person in the building with a working knowledge of the game. (It should be known as far as I know the kid turned out fine - at least in the sense that he never blew the building to hell.)

  13. #13
    Strawberry (Level 2) goemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    419
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    After a second, careful reading of the text, this doesn't sound that bad. It sounds like it won't be illegal to sell unrated games -- just illegal to sell a Mature game to someone under 17 or similar.

    If it does turn out to be bad, I'll start a game smuggling business between NJ and NYC. So much for their bill reducing crime.

    If I had a Jynx think of the things we can do together. She also kisses alot.
    Not to mention her breast plates is obviously hiding something nice
    The of Jynx as a XXX doll pokemon. -Rugal Sizzler


    ┏┫∵┣┛My Collection┏┫∵┣┛

  14. #14
    Insert Coin (Level 0)
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    81
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    I'm sure you're game smuggling will be a resounding success, Goemon, which will in turn lead Rockstar to make a game based on it that will be too violent, so you can in turn smuggle into the state...profit, profits, hundred dollah bills ya'all!

  15. #15
    Banned

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    263
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    So pawn shops can't sell the older games without ratings after January 1, 2008? Is this only in New York? Do flea markets count?
    The thing is nobody cares and the law will eventaully fade away. As with Prohibition, Walking between cars, child abuse, selling cigarettes and alcohol to minors, and smoking or using illeagal drugs.

    Nobody is going to care about this one at all. I mean we allready had this in the mid 90's and that probably cost the carrer of a certain Actress who eventually turned to porno.

    Personally the powers invested in me the USA and let the darkness take them over. USA is like a dead horse it was hype and now it is a joke trying to regain it's commercialism.

    USA will never fool me again nore should it fool you. Also where is when you need them

  16. #16
    Kirby (Level 13) Buyatari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    5,335
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Xbox LIVE
    WastingOrpheus

    Default

    What qualifies as a game? Minesweeper on a cel phone is that a game?

  17. #17
    Strawberry (Level 2) goemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    419
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mregashu View Post
    I'm sure you're game smuggling will be a resounding success, Goemon, which will in turn lead Rockstar to make a game based on it that will be too violent, so you can in turn smuggle into the state...profit, profits, hundred dollah bills ya'all!
    That would be one hell of a game. First you have to tear ass across the George Washington Bridge while leaning out the window shooting randomly at other cars. Then you get to sit in a traffic jam on the Henry Hudson for half an hour. HARDCORE!

    If I had a Jynx think of the things we can do together. She also kisses alot.
    Not to mention her breast plates is obviously hiding something nice
    The of Jynx as a XXX doll pokemon. -Rugal Sizzler


    ┏┫∵┣┛My Collection┏┫∵┣┛

  18. #18
    Kirby (Level 13) Griking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,548
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Most people here are too partial to think rational about any law regulating videogames. People over-react too much. I really don't see why people are so up in arms about a bill to keep violent games out of the reach of kids.

  19. #19
    Pac-Man (Level 10) vintagegamecrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tryin' to smell the color 9
    Posts
    2,504
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    I don't have any problem with a law passed that way. I do play violent games maybe too much and I know they are pretty nasty at times. I can understand Resident Evil and Silent hill but I morally oppose GTA or any game of that genre. That game has no good qualities IMO and kids or anyone for that fact needs to play that game.
    If they made a movie out of your top five worst sins, what would it be rated?

    Check out my list of trades on GameTZ Link

  20. #20
    Cherry (Level 1) djsquarewave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    239
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mregashu View Post
    I know this an unpopular opinion 'round these parts, but I don't see a major problem here. There is a big difference between censorship and enforcement of ratings and I think as long as the latter doesn't impede on the former it's a good thing. 12 and 13 year old kids for the most part shouldn't be playing Grand Theft Auto 3. Sure there are some mature enough to handle these themes just like there are some kids that age who are mature enough to watch Goodfellas or the Departed. But there are just as many who aren't and should stick to something lighter for a while.

    Parents need to make the right choices and become involved in what their kids do. Honestly, I think most parents who do that probably have a stable, healthy relationship with their kids and those kids aren't going to be serious risks anyway. The problem is that the kid's who psychologically are at risk to do something drastic don't often have that stable parental relationship, therefore their parents don't care what they play and won't monitor their kids choices. Unfortunately, that means a strictly enforced rating system is the only way to keep games that these kids shouldn't play out of their hands. I know it sucks sometimes to have society's feeble dangling at the public teat, but if it makes for a safer, more civilized society so be it. So long as it doesn't infringe on my personal rights to beat up virtual hookers I'm OK with that.
    I'm all for anything that keeps mature content away from little hands and eyes. The problem is that regulation like this really isn't going to keep these games from the kids who really shouldn't be playing them. If their parents don't care, then when the kid gets turned down at the store he's going to go scream at his mom until she buys it for him. When the clerk tells her it's not intended for kids, she'll buy it anyway just to shut the kid up.

    I've seen this happen more than once already. A mild example of parental failure...

    Quote Originally Posted by goemon View Post
    That would be one hell of a game. First you have to tear ass across the George Washington Bridge while leaning out the window shooting randomly at other cars. Then you get to sit in a traffic jam on the Henry Hudson for half an hour. HARDCORE!
    Considering the next generation's ability to render large numbers of identical objects (why hello dead rising), I'd hope Rockstar cooks up some thick, creamy traffic for GTA4.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2012, 02:56 AM
  2. Illinois senate passes stupid new law
    By Promophile in forum Classic Gaming
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 05-25-2005, 03:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •