First hand in the store. Remember, I work at Sears and I see these returns daily. I work in the electronics section, which involves TVs and cameras. I am a sales person there. Plus I have to deal with irate customers who come complaining when this happens...which gets annoying, so I basically look at who sold the item to them and I redirect them with the same associate.
This is pure speculation/approximation, but I would say around 60% of what is sold is Sony stuff. Around perhaps 45%-%50 (of the after mentioned 60%) percent are returned and marked as "991", or used merchandise. This in turn is resold as a "slightly" lower price. I write "slightly" because some times the lower price for it being used is HIGHER. Dunno how administration thinks, to be honest... boggles the mind
Not always. I've had customers come to me and say "Busco Sony porque mi novia me dijo que es la mejor marca" (I am looking for Sony because my girlfriend told me it was the best brand) or "Busco Sony porque todos en el trabajo tienen Sony y quiero la misma" (I'm looking for Sony because everyone at work has them and I want the same one). It's rare for me to get customers that want Sony because of personal experience (an item they once had). And in some circumstances, I've had the same customers come to me with a return stating "No entiendo porque esta salio mala si yo he tenido Sony y no se me han danado" (I don't understand why it turned out damaged since I've had Sony and they've never gotten damaged)Sure, there are many stuborn people that only want a particlar brand like Sony as you mention, but why do they want a Sony TV in the first place? Where did they get this idea from that Sony is the best? If they think that Sony TVs are the best, and then they come home and see that the quality isnt good enough, at last compared to their expecations, is it then likely that they will still think that Sony is the best?
I'm not saying all Sony's are bad, because most returns are because of stupid ass reasons customers have, I believe many times because they can't pay for it. But I have to admit that a big number of the returns are products that either don't meet expectations or something happened to it. This was specially true with Cybershot S650 and onward.
I have to admit that many returns, as stated previously, is simply because of stupid reasons customers give. This is why Sears, and many other stores, will reinstate the 15% restocking fee (it was taken out for some time). Why? To prevent unfair returns. Heck, many products were simply used ONE time and returned for no apparent reason! For example...a PPV boxing match. People would purchase an LCD TV just to see the fight and return it because "it didn't meet their expectations". But I can tell these apart, specially when I ask whether they want an exchange or a different model, and they simply want their money back. Honest returns I can identity faily quickly too, most being that the customer wants something else.As you say, people return the TV and say their new product failed to meet their expectations, which makes me assume that after an experience like this they dont think that Sony is the best anymore. Wouldnt this translate to bad word to mouth?
There are tricks one learns when working so long in retail.
I personally try NOT to sell Sony products, because of what has happened in the past. So far, I've had great success. Of course, if a customer wants a particular Sony model, I can't refuse the sale because I loose money and I can loose my job (bait and switch). But I am on the pessimist side: I always expect the customer to return it back. It does happen form time to time. But since I don't focus on Sony, my return rate is extremely low, which means better performance for me and more $$$ in my pocket.
But you are right: this should, in theory, cause sales to lower for Sony. But remember that many are masochists when it comes to brand name: they stick to it no matter what happens. I've had customers return many Olevia TVs and STILL want Olevia TVs. But hey, it's their problem.