Open Game Lister | Partial Game Collection
Games Completed in: 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | Unknown
Oklahoma DP Roll Call!
Yeeeeeaaaaaah!
This is extremely disheartening.
Last edited by kainemaxwell; 05-12-2009 at 08:59 PM.
My Gaming Collection (Now at Google Drive!)
Funny how a company sits on a license then legally attacks the hell out of someone when a fan game is made...
Why dont you dimwits actually make a new Chrono Game then? derp de derp.
DERP
As somebody who works on his own intellectual property (and has studied copyright) I fully understand Square's position. There's a quality control issue as well as a market saturation issue.
This.
I do think that waiting this long sounds fishy but that's assuming Square knew about the project. And even if they did wait on purpose, I think what they're doing (and it makes sense from a resource management and PR angle) is letting people have their fun but once it appears that a real release of something legit looking is imminent they bring the axe down. If they went after every single thing the second it got started they'd seriously waste lots of resources fighting against bullshit little things and also pushing away a hell of a lot of people.
"There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." --Bertrand Russel (attributed)
So what's stopping the people involved from just finishing it and quietly releasing it?
I just don't see how Squeenix could do anything about it.
The same is true for any similar fan project.
They just need to be careful about what they publish on the web.
It's still illegal. Like someone releasing a crack for a valuable piece of software. The crack on its own is useless, and doesn't do any damage until it's actually used -- but it doesn't make it any less illegal.
They can backtrack the owner of the site by going after the host, and get the guy's billing info that way. And work their way up from there.So what's stopping the people involved from just finishing it and quietly releasing it?
I just don't see how Squeenix could do anything about it.
It's not as simple as "ZOMG RELEASE IT NOW".
Last edited by Kitsune Sniper; 05-12-2009 at 11:17 PM.
As far as I know, it wouldn't be enabling piracy, what exactly about it would be illegal if theres no IP protected work in the file? It would be no different then than someone creating a map for a online fps or a track for a PC NASCAR game, which the last I heard weren't illegal to distribute or create even when the developers didn't encourage it and the community had to figure out how to do it.
Others have done similar things to get around IP infringement, such as with the Star Fox 2 patch to translate, correct bugs, and hide the debug menu. Only the end user is committing piracy by downloading or having the rom to the game.
The difference between that is that those games usually WANT people to create their own content by using the game's materials and can even provide tools to do so.
You can't compare a legal mod, supported by a game's creators, to a romhack, which is illegal from the start. You're modifying the game's code, not adding to it without altering the original game (like said maps and levels).
I would be glad to donate $5 if such a fine were actually imposed.
Chrono Trigger is one of those wonderful exceptions to the need for an illegal rom. Anybody got the FF Chronicles release? Try booting "ROM.BIN" in an SNES emulator. You legally own that rom, without the need to download it illegally. It also opens perfectly fine in Temporal Flux, the most comprehensive CT rom editor that I know.
If there's any rom that can be hacked legally, it's CT.
However, there IS validity in SE's claim. The hack would include references to the Chrono Trigger story, characters, etc. Technically, it's just like fan fiction, but both make use of content that the author does not own the rights to.
If you were to make an ORIGINAL game out of CT, I'm not sure if SE would have a claim. The patch file you distribute would only contain information related to changes in the file, which would all be original content that you have ownership of. Making a legal claim on that would be akin to Nintendo suing a paint company because I spraypainted my NES.
As I tried to make clear with my post, even games where this isn't supported by the developers and there are no resources provided to figure out how to do it, such as creating new tracks for Papyrus' series of PC racing titles, aren't illegal or haven't been acted upon.
You've yet to state how a patch that alters the game code, as long as there's no infringing use of IP protected material in the patch, would be illegal to release. What law would that fall under? The developers aren't doing any IP infringing. From my experience, things are legal if they take the forms of a patch and they're not distributing a patched rom (The PC racing simulation community has had legal issues when a exe is modified to do something like simulate a different racing series and then distributed, but when its just a patch that the end user must run that modifies their exe on their own hd, its been fine).
I suspect a similar parallel can be drawn to the emulation community, and is probably why others have done similar things with translation patches and such for many rpg's for one example.
Last edited by Leo_A; 05-12-2009 at 11:46 PM.
Looks like I'm not going to convince you regardless of what I say. I will say this, though:
I've been romhacking for more than seven years. I've released patches for several games. And the moment a company tells me to stop, I will, because I know full well that what I do is blatantly illegal. I have no legal grounds to stand on. If a company doesn't want me to do this, then I'll stop.
The fact that I'm only releasing a patch doesn't matter. It's just like a crack comes out to make a demo version of a game into the full one -- it's ILLEGAL because it will modify the game code, because that is its only purpose.
This isn't about fighting THE MAN. So stop complaining about the game not being released. It's a shame, yes, but unless the team wants to end up in court or in jail, what's the alternative?
That's illegal because its enabling piracy and there's no other usefulness of it. I'm not sure you can draw a parallel between that and a patch for a rom.
It's still an unauthorized game modification. What part of "unauthorized" is so difficult to understand?
Squeenix owns the game, Squeenix doesn't want anyone to fuck with their property, Squeenix throws lawsuits around to ensure this doesn't happen. This isn't about the patch being useful, it's still illegal.
We'll have to agree to disagree, I'm not sure there's a law that prevents unauthorized modifications to a videogame. I've seen no evidence of such a thing unless it enabled piracy. I've only seen evidence that supports my position, such as the Game Genie lawsuit Nintendo brought against the company producing them in the early 90s.
Last edited by Leo_A; 05-13-2009 at 12:24 AM.
As I said above, even if by some reading of the law such a patch might not be illegal, the authors said in their own readme, "This is illegal and we'll have to stop if someone tells us to," or words to that effect. Like I said, a bit odd.
"There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." --Bertrand Russel (attributed)