I suppose you could take that attitude about almost anything. But in the end, what's the likelihood of them being wrong? I'm not saying if they are or aren't, I don't really follow the Atari legacy, but it just seems like that there are Bushnell loyalists who have less reason to be than people have to believe these guys' accounts of the man. The Bushnell defense almost seems like blind loyalty/admiration, based mainly on an affinity for the former Atari brand.