Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: Why exactly is retro gaming so much bigger then it used to be?

  1. #1
    Strawberry (Level 2)
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    504
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default Why exactly is retro gaming so much bigger then it used to be?

    Everyone seems to blame the hipsters and the resellers, but I've been thinking abou this, and I think there's very real answers to this. One is, I think, there are far more consoles and games today that are considered to be classic or retro. Retro to me, is just a sliding scale term, the Colecovision is retro cuz 80s stuff is retro. Same with spandex and jerry curls. Retro. Now 90s stuff is considered retro as well. Ren & Stimpy, Mark E. Mark and Sega Genesis. Plus the Ps1, Dreamcast, and N64 are now retro as well. There's more considered classic.

    I also believe it's cuz gaming is far different then it was, there was nostalgia for me in 2000, I remember my uncle giving me the NES and Genesis I had played as a kid around that time, and I held onto them ever since cuz to me there was a nostalgia element, and I felt there was some value to what I considered "classic" games at the time. But Ps1 was not retro at all, to me. Now we see tonsa genres that are long forgotten, only kept alive thru the indie game market. Games r obviously way different then they were. Obviously.

  2. #2
    ServBot (Level 11) badinsults's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Somewhere on planet Earth / #vbender
    Posts
    3,986
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Number of Atari 2600s sold worldwide: 30 million

    Number of NES/Famicom systems sold worldwide: 62 million

    People are now at the age where they grew up with the NES, and have enough money and freedom to buy things. Plus the Internet is much bigger than 15 years ago when the people who grew up with Atari were in the same mode. There are potentially twice as many people who enjoyed the NES era as the Atari era, so it is no wonder it seems bigger now. I'm sure in a few years, it will grow even more when people who grew up with the PS1 come of age.
    <Evan_G> i keep my games in an inaccessable crate where i can't play them

  3. #3
    Cherry (Level 1) Flojomojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    200
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Default

    Every day that goes by adds more cool things to the "retro" catalog. Today's kids think PS2 and Dreamcast are "retro." Mobile devices can play many of these games now. The "retro" pool will always be growing.

    PS2 and Dreamcast are about 15 years old. When they were new, the NES was about 15 years old. Stuff like NES and Genesis is closer in time to the Atari 2600, even though the gaming sensibilities are closer to what we have on modern systems.

    Retro will never die!

  4. #4
    Insert Coin (Level 0) MaxWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    44
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badinsults View Post
    Number of Atari 2600s sold worldwide: 30 million

    Number of NES/Famicom systems sold worldwide: 62 million

    People are now at the age where they grew up with the NES, and have enough money and freedom to buy things. Plus the Internet is much bigger than 15 years ago when the people who grew up with Atari were in the same mode. There are potentially twice as many people who enjoyed the NES era as the Atari era, so it is no wonder it seems bigger now. I'm sure in a few years, it will grow even more when people who grew up with the PS1 come of age.

    ^ That is pretty much what I think too. I am an example of that myself.

    I grew up with the NES and sega genesis.
    I started buying and collecting retro gaming stuff about 4 years ago.
    I was always into retro gaming but before that I used emulators as I did not have the money to spare on that stuff.

  5. #5
    Kirby (Level 13) Tanooki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    5,964
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Default

    I think the popularity is a combination of those who had or wanted as a kid and want it or it back. Then you have those who are kids of them or others who just see all the hype and hipster ravings about such things and go digging, get exposed, and end up preferring these challenging but easier to pick up and get right into them experiences. Those new are younger, not much dough, and you can get a lot of old games for the price of one $60 new one that will last a hell of a lot longer than your usual 4-6hour $60 title.

  6. #6
    FPGA arm-based system Custom rank graphic
    bb_hood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    2,091
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    46
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    23
    Thanked in
    21 Posts
    PSN
    bb_hood99

    Default

    I think more and more people are waking up to the fact that just because a game is old does not mean that it is obsolete or outdated.

    Also, as far as collecting 'retro' video games goes, retro games appeal to a much larger audience then other collectibles like sports cards and comic books.


    Also, what the hell is a hipster? Ive heard the term mentioned on these forums with regard to high prices in games but I dont understand what type of people these are..
    Last edited by bb_hood; 06-08-2014 at 01:35 PM.

  7. #7
    Cherry (Level 1) PizzaKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    302
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    I blame Youtube

  8. #8
    Great Puma (Level 12)
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,932
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badinsults View Post
    I'm sure in a few years, it will grow even more when people who grew up with the PS1 come of age.
    Should have already happened or will have happen real soon. The PS1 was released in '94. Assuming someone got it when they were around 5, they'd be around 20 now.

  9. #9
    Kirby (Level 13) Tanooki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    5,964
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Default

    The hipster definition varies really. Originally it was like a look and style of a set of people. But in the gaming circles think of it as someone who sees popular sources in public deem something as cool and trendy, so they suddenly become aware or even pull a 180 from hater to lover and jump head in. They don't always think or do smart moves, they just want to be hip and part of the in group as long as whatever is IN is in, kind of like a fad. With games, it started to show up in modern ads and cartoons(like Gumball or Adventure Time on Cartoon Network) or an explosion of a game like Minecraft, and as more and more got into it, it was cool to be into it, but they don't just stay to the confines of a minecraft or a call of duty. They'll want to be the hippest cat of the bunch so they'll jump into the retro market to show how hip and hardcore they are. THey'll buy up all the sought after trendy expensive shit and not even try to find a deal or whatever, then propagate the problem further being show offs with lame fucking find videos on youtube and how to... this and that and try and be a trend setter and attention getter with a lot of likes. There's your gamer hipster type really, the sheep who can't just be cool on their own, but want to get total acceptance from a group and will buy into whatever the culture wants at the time without any regard to the crap they pull.

  10. #10
    Key (Level 9)
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fairfield, California
    Posts
    1,847
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Default

    because new games suck. cookie cutter no variety in systems or games anymore like we had in the 80s and 90s. early 00s were ok but gaming became way too mainstream by mid 2000s and has just gotten worse since. I say the super epic time for gaming was when NES was still relevant (1991) until 2001 when ps2 gamecube and xbox came out. I say the 15 years from 1988 to 2003 were the pinnacle of video gaming. just my opinion. everything before and after just not as good. for me personally 1990 until 1998 were my hardcore gaming years when I was obsessed and in love with all things gaming. basically nes through n64

    think of nes snes n64 like a pyramid. nes = awesome snes = the best ever = n64 = awesome I think its safe to say gaming peaked in the snes genesis war. it was like a world war of video games. Nintendo and sega the main enemies but also many other "countries" (companies) were involved like snk nec 3do Atari which just added to the excitement. not to mention arcade gaming was at its absolute peak at this time as well. not to mention computer gaming was finally coming into its own. the 1990s were just incredible.......... think of the sheer number of systems and games released in the 90s.

  11. #11
    Pear (Level 6) Gentlegamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bb_hood View Post
    Also, what the hell is a hipster? Ive heard the term mentioned on these forums with regard to high prices in games but I dont understand what type of people these are..

  12. #12
    Alex (Level 15) Custom rank graphic
    Gameguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
    Posts
    7,918
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    78
    Thanked in
    70 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevincal View Post
    because new games suck.
    You beat me to it. I know some people who aren't even into games at all but generally have some current consoles for their kids, mainly complaining about how they look and feel too realistic to be fun, almost like a regular movie but interactive in an annoying way. They're story driven but instead of just being able to watch it, you have to play through a crap level to keep the story going. Instead one these people told me he searched out for a Super Nintendo just to have something fun to play with, and a few Gameboy games like Metroid II or GBA games. This is from someone who isn't into game collecting.

  13. #13
    Pear (Level 6) retroman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    1,278
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    7 Posts
    Xbox LIVE
    retroman20/retroman21
    PSN
    retroman13

    Default

    Supply and demand have a lot to do with it also. A lot of people want the old games, but not a whole lot of product for sale.

  14. #14
    Pac-Man (Level 10) Rickstilwell1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,802
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    PSN
    TheGameCollector

    Default

    What surprises me is that hipsters aren't all going after Japanese releases instead due to them being the original worldwide releases in most cases for Nintendo, Sega and Sony and being cool for being out of the ordinary in the USA. Instead, the Japanese items remain cheaper.

    The odd thing about Atari 2600 is that even though there were less units sold, less people tend to want the system than something like NES.
    [quote name='Shidou Mariya' date='Nov 17 2010, 10:05 PM' post='4889940']
    I'm a collector, but only to a certain extent.
    Not as extreme as Rickstilwell though.[/quote]


  15. #15
    Key (Level 9) Satoshi_Matrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,956
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    PSN
    Satoshi_Matrix

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flojomojo View Post
    Today's kids think PS2 and Dreamcast are "retro."
    ...you say that as if it isn't true.

    It's not a matter of what kids think, its just a simple matter of time.

    Like it or not, the Dreamcast, PS2, GameCube, Xbox and GameBoy Advance are all at this point retro consoles. There's a huge amount of hypocrisy with retro gamers who refuse to consider anything made after 2000 as retro. That's not how it works. With the passage of time, everything that is current will eventually be retro, even the brand new PS4, Xbox One and WiiU. Those will all given time be retro consoles the same as the Atari 2600, NES and yes, PS2 and Dreamcast.
    check out my classic gaming review site: http://satoshimatrix.wordpress.com/

  16. #16
    Peach (Level 3) A Black Falcon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    705
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badinsults View Post
    Number of Atari 2600s sold worldwide: 30 million

    Number of NES/Famicom systems sold worldwide: 62 million

    People are now at the age where they grew up with the NES, and have enough money and freedom to buy things. Plus the Internet is much bigger than 15 years ago when the people who grew up with Atari were in the same mode. There are potentially twice as many people who enjoyed the NES era as the Atari era, so it is no wonder it seems bigger now. I'm sure in a few years, it will grow even more when people who grew up with the PS1 come of age.
    That is definitely part of it, but that's not the whole answer. Sure, many people have gotten in to retro gaming because of nostalgia, but also NES and newer games are generally regarded better today than 2nd gen stuff is. Even among many gamers who didn't grow up with the NES, I think that stuff from the 3rd gen and beyond has good enough gameplay and graphics to get peoples' interest now... but 2nd gen games? They're very short and simple. They are good too, but I can see why they're less popular.

    So what I'm saying is, I don't expect there to be a big price crash like there was with Atari stuff after the Atari nostalgia bubble popped. There are too many people getting in to the 3rd gen and beyond classic markets who DIDN'T play the games back then for that to happen. That wasn't nearly as true with Atari.

  17. #17
    Kirby (Level 13) Tanooki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    5,964
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rickstilwell1 View Post
    What surprises me is that hipsters aren't all going after Japanese releases instead due to them being the original worldwide releases in most cases for Nintendo, Sega and Sony and being cool for being out of the ordinary in the USA. Instead, the Japanese items remain cheaper.

    The odd thing about Atari 2600 is that even though there were less units sold, less people tend to want the system than something like NES.
    That's a GOOD thing. I got fed up with US prices so I bought up around 20 famicom games and for the very few that were over the $30~ range I got famiclones which were priced quite nicely. I think the hipsters don't want things hard, they want it easy to be cool, so putting up with crazy symbol print Japanese is probably a headache.

  18. #18
    Bell (Level 8) 7th lutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,798
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rickstilwell1 View Post

    The odd thing about Atari 2600 is that even though there were less units sold, less people tend to want the system than something like NES.
    That is not odd based on what I read on Nintendo Life a few years ago. What is really happening is people got their start start on the NES or the 16 bit era has a very difficult time with the graphics of the depth of Atari 2600 games.

    While I grew up with Atari 2600 and Atari 7800 before getting a Nes in 1991, Atari wasn't looked upon as a cool company by gamers that got their Start with the Nes. The video game media for years mentioned the crash was caused by Atari because of Pac-man and ET. I am saying this as a person in his mid 30's that my parents gave me an Intellivision II during the video game crash as a Christmas gift.

  19. #19
    ServBot (Level 11) Edmond Dantes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,868
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    32
    Thanked in
    31 Posts

    Default

    The real reason retro gaming got bigger?

    To piss me off.

    "I suddenly wanna play Contra III. Bet I can find it easily..."

    *Finds out that all the stores that have it have ridiculously inflated prices on it, along with signs underneath that say "Fuck you Edmond"*

    "CURSE YOU ALL!"

  20. #20
    Banned

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    nYc
    Posts
    427
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    It's not even as popular now as it was 10 years ago, thats when retro gaming was really at the top of its game, with collectors popping up everywhere, insane prices for even PS1 games and everyone and their mother was looking for a top loader NES. That was when this website really blew up in popularity too (it is a shell of its former self). With that boom a lot more collectors and old testers came out of the woodwork and a lot of really rare stuff was pretty easy to find and cheap, until the stock ran out of course (Playstation dev units were rather easy to find for ~50$ if you were on the right forums; even U64 & Dolphin dev units were popping up). While I personally would never consider PS1 and anything that came out after it as 'retro' that is obviously more a factor of my age than anything. To me, the Sony Playstation will always be the turning point towards "modern gaming". To me retro will always be before the modern age of 3d gaming, when sprites were the standard, not polygons.
    But I suspect that OP is right, that 'retro' will be a sliding scale, no matter how inaccurate the scale is, being tipped by newcomers who refer to the games they played when they were 8 as retro. Which reminds me of a comic i once saw on dorkly:





    While "retro" gaming is currently popular, its not actually the old games themselves (at least not as much as it was 10 years ago), but games that are reminisce of old games that are gaining more momentum (mobile games like Knights of Pen & Paper, 10000000, Organ Trail, Star Command; PC games like Hotline Miami, Monkey Island Special Edition, To the Moon...) even GoG has really took off. On the other hand, almost all old games have dropped in price significantly, some by 50%! mostly due to ports and remakes to all modern consoles as well as mobile.


    As for *WHY*, I'd reckon it is for two major reasons:
    1)80s to early 90s gamers grew up into functioning adults with well paying jobs and reminisce about the simpler times (or whatever emotion it elicits). Some are playing catch up, collecting and playing what they didn't have an opportunity to as a child and
    2)Since gaming is mainstream now (thanks largely to the people in the above group) more and more kids are getting into it and are looking to explore "what came before". It helps things that most genres and franchises got their rise in the 80s and early 90s and since they are still around, you get instant brand recognition going backwards. (not to mention that most of the game industry folk, also mostly belong to group 1, further advertising retro games, even if it is implicit).


    Anyone who says modern games suck is just a hater and/or fanboy and/or attention craving hipster (being from Brooklyn, where the modern hipster was more or less born, we have a different definition of the term: someone who is counter popular culture, in everything from film to clothing). There are more games coming out now than ever before, across far more genres and topics. You have self taught basement coders and multi billion dollar companies churning out great games (and literally everything in between). Old games have been preserved (and remade), and developers are pushing further and further.

    There is a lot of people talking about old games being better, but take all that with a grain of salt. Nostalgia has a way of clouding one's vision. There were great games then and great games now. More so now, so much so that it is impossible to keep track of everything that is coming out (consoles are easy to keep track, but if you limit yourself to only playing console games you're playing Solitaire with a deck of 28).

    Every generation will have people coming out of it saying games 'back then' were better, and yet the industry is growing, gaming is a major part of our culture, more games are coming out than ever. Better than ever. Games like GTA V, Skyrim... hell, even WoW are things that the devs 20+ years ago could barely dream of... and thats why each of those has a retro seed which bloomed into the awesomeness we have today.
    Last edited by postulio; 06-10-2014 at 03:12 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Has the Rise of Retro Gaming affected Current-Gen Gaming?
    By Arkanoid_Katamari in forum Classic Gaming
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-01-2014, 04:08 AM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-18-2012, 07:05 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-22-2009, 06:25 PM
  4. FS: Issues 2 - 9 Of Retro Gamer (UK Retro Gaming Mag)
    By RetroRevival in forum Buying and Selling
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-17-2004, 10:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •