What Game/s are You Playing? Daily / Whenever Check :) (GAMEPLAY)

[Atomicfear]

Everquest and I'm thinking about buying a dreamcast just to play railroad tycoon 2. Yes, I live in the year 2000.

[kupomogli]

A got all four tablets on Beyond the Beyond meaning I've made it to the games last two dungeons, at this point I'm a bit bored of it so decided I'll just move on. Maybe I'll go back to it later but at this point I'm putting a hold on it.

There are a few games that I did play though during this point. I finished Sword of the Vagrant on hard and then played through NG+ to the very end on very hard, but since there's a true ending area and I can't find out how to reach that I've saved at the last save point and put this game away. Also, the game doesn't start getting anymore difficult in NG+ until the very end of the game, I'd recommend just playing the game in very hard from the get go and maybe doing NG+ in lunatic.

The two games I'm playing at this time though now, I've played five chapters in Fire Emblem on the GBA, the first US release, not the first GBA release.

---

I've also played two runs of Ravenswatch which imo is both good and bad. I have both really positive things to say about it and negative things to say about it.

Starting with the negative is that, like most procedural games, the game feels very samey. You start the game, you play the run, you die, you restart, you do it all over again, and it's just one of the few things I hate in modern gaming where there are these select few genres that are just prioritized. Whether it's because it's exploration platformers, procedural, or open world, it's games that waste a lot of time. For indie developers they're more low effort, low cost games that forces the player to spend more time to do the same things over and over to extend the length of the game, and that's unfortunately the end goal of modern gaming. The length of a game matters above all else.

Now, I've only played Scarlet, Little Red Riding hood, so the bosses may change between characters, but I don't believe they do. The game has three procedural Diablo-like maps with important areas around, these areas will either have treasure chests, quest encounters, max HP, or gems, all to buy a specific amount of items and tools and then increase the rank of these tools from common to legendary. And all of this brings so much repetition in a single run that you just keep doing this over and over and over and over, the fact that it took me 30-40 minutes to see and die from the second boss and there are only three maps with three bosses. Again, unless the bosses change per character which I doubt it.

Now the novelty of this is that this game is Diablo in what's essentially around an hour and 30 minutes to two hours, but unlock the Diablo games this leans heavily towards skill based instead. Each of the nine characters on disc or the two patched in characters(and I can tell you right now based on sales this game isn't getting a complete edition) the characters have a primary attack, power attack, special attack, defensive manuever, super attack, and a dash. Even the easiest enemies can kill you in a few hits, so it's mitigating damage, attacking with your cooldowns and primary, evading when necessary, etc and again, it's about choosing the skills as you level up to determine your build path. Every enemy has a their own attacks or their own form of getting to you to deal damage, some enemies may even explode after being defeated dealing damage to other enemies as well as you if you're in range when they die. With Scarlet, she can dash through enemies to deal damage to enemies and each time you build up her critical, the power attack deals more damage, but you can dash through multiple enemies making it more useful, while in werewolf form the power attack is a lunch that can hit adjacent enemies in a close formation, but cannot dash through htem, in both cases the defensive attack might help the character where in Scarlet's case she can't be damaged until it wears off or until she attacks, while the werewolf will recover a very small percentage of life for a short amount of time, making using that ability and having your other passives ready to go is more optimal. Pushes you to learn the enemy movements and route the enemies properly to make the most out of your moveset.

[kupomogli]

And after playing 10 hours of Ravenswatch, I've finished the game, not because I've completed it, but because I'm done. I've made it to "a last boss" apparently there are four final bosses after you defeat the day three final boss, and that's according to the trophy list, but all the other bosses are the same.

The 10 hours consisted of either nine or 10 runs, and a game that at length to complete is an hour and 30 minutes, allowing you to save between areas. I know that I only played three attempts with Aladdin and I got to the final boss, but Scarlet may have been six or seven as I was getting to grips with understanding the flow of the game. Maybe I could have finished the game with Scarlet if I kept on going with her but my complaints about the game since the very first run, I just wanted to try someone else, have a little more variety as I knew the game itself wouldn't.

And that's again, the biggest problem of the game. The biggest problem with modern day indie games in general is that the games are either a 2D side-scrolling exploration game or a procedural game as the large amount of games that are released by indie developers, both of which are very padded experiences, forcing the player to either repeat what's essentially an hours worth of content endless over and over until you finally get good enough or lucky enough to have a winning combination of items in your inventory or what can be a great designed explorable world but more often than not, it's a poorly designed explorable world and the problem with that is that it's always one key item that will lock you out of progress as that's the nature of the game, so you may have 20 points of interest you can't progress, but if that one key item or one of those points of interest are poorly explained or visualized to the players, you're going to either spend hours and hours and hours of wandering or just throw your hands in the air and look that sh-- up online. That's pretty much most indie games and even a lot of modern day AAA developers are doing this as well because padding is the name of the game in the modern day gaming scene, where most modern devs opt for open world, but other modern developers are being inspired by indie devs with games like Dynasty Warriors Origins, Returnal, Elden Ring Nightreign, games that have this modern AAA bullshit, now have this indie bullshit as well.

[Aussie2B]

I was correct in my last post that I was close to the end of the chapter I was in then in London Detective Mysteria for Vita (which is now apparently Vita-exclusive for its English release, as the PC version was delisted just recently). I was even closer to the end than I had guessed, as the game dropped the whole subplot of figuring out the mystery surrounding the deaths of the protagonist's parents. I assume you can't get a proper conclusion on that until you clear some/all routes. Anyway, the chapter after that was like a last hurrah for the common route. It involved a picnic with all the main characters, where you first systematically have one-on-one time with each love interest and the most significant side characters and then everyone comes together to eat. I did manage to get onto a route before taking off to visit family, as the person who helps Emily clean up after the picnic indicates whose route you're about to start.

I was expecting to switch to something else after that, mainly because I was only taking earbuds with me and don't like playing visual novels (ones with voice acting at least) without high-quality headphones. But it turns out my husband has a couple pairs of decent headphones that he keeps at my mom's house, and I've been using one pair to continue playing London Detective Mysteria. I don't like these headphones as much as my usual pair, but they're good enough to hear the voice acting clearly. As I expected, I did end up on Holmes's route. I believe the character routes are an additional five chapters, and I cleared the first one for Holmes. There weren't even any choices to make. It feels like I've read quite a bit in the next one, so maybe I'm close to polishing off another. Still not too much in the way of drama or romance, so I'm waiting for you-know-what to hit the fan haha.

[Aussie2B]

Still haven't finished off the chapter I was in when I made my last past about London Detective Mysteria on Vita, and it's not for lack of playing. It feels like a million things have happened in this chapter, and it's still going. There was a segment at school, then a long flashback, then a segment at Holmes and Watson's flat, and now more drama in another location. Still no choices in sight either, so it's practically been feeling like a kinetic novel, especially compared to how frequently choices seemed to pop up in the common route. And while the drama is increasing, the relationship between Emily and Holmes still feels like barely anything beyond friendship. I'm not saying that as a complaint, though, just an assessment of the story as it currently stands.

[Aussie2B]

Okay, so I was literally only a couple ellipses away from the end of the chapter I was in as of my last post in London Detective Mysteria on Vita, haha. The way this game works is that, between scenes, it cuts to a black screen with a few ellipses to skip through, I guess to show the passage of time or whatever. I find those make for good spots to stop playing and save, so I'm not confused by stopping mid-conversation the next time I load the game up. But those transitions are also used right before the chapters change, so sometimes I leave off right at the very end of a chapter and don't even realize it. Anyway, I'm a ways into the next chapter now, and there's a teeeeeny bit of romance starting to creep in. It's cute seeing Watson observe things and take on something of a wingman role. (Which I suppose you could say Watson always was, just not previously in matters of romance.) I like that Lupin is showing up again too, as his regular self, not under his disguise, which I find kind of annoying. On that note, this route has gone on and on about how those who are adept at wearing disguises can see through the disguises of others, so why the heck has Holmes, who wears disguises and can see through his father's disguises, been seemingly unable to see through Lupin's disguise? It's not like it's even a good one, haha. Going by "John Lupine" instead of "Jean Lupin", wearing glasses, and speaking with a nervous stutter isn't exactly obscuring things a lot.