Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Why did the PlayStation completely obliterate everything in its path?

  1. #21
    Pac-Man (Level 10) Rickstilwell1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    2 Posts


    I think the playable demo discs that they started putting out (in 1997?), especially the Official U.S. Playstation Magazine and Playstation Underground Magazine discs also did a lot to help make people interested in the games. Once you tried a couple levels of an upcoming game, you couldn't wait till the full game came out so you could play the rest. It's something I started to miss that I don't think they had anymore in the PS3 generation.
    [quote name='Shidou Mariya' date='Nov 17 2010, 10:05 PM' post='4889940']
    I'm a collector, but only to a certain extent.
    Not as extreme as Rickstilwell though.[/quote]

  2. #22
    Strawberry (Level 2)
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    19 Posts


    Thought about this one some more, after the latest 3DO thread. There are several scenarios that could have happened to make the 32/64-bit generation turn out more like the 16-bit generation (two victors) instead of the steamrolling the PS1 did. The reason the PS1 was successful is because Sony did everything right.

    The PS1 had 102.49 million sales, the N64 32.93 million, the Saturn 9.26 million, and the 3DO 2 million. That gave Sony a 70% market share for the generation. Between the PS2's 155 million sales, the Xbox's 24 million, the Gamecube's 22 million, and the Dreamcast's 9.13 million, Sony nailed down 74% of the market for its generation.

    If the N64 had used CDs, it would have easily sold 60 million units or more, probably ending up neck and next with the PS1.
    Real collectors drive Hondas, Toyotas, Chevys, Fords, etc... not Rolls Royces.

  3. #23
    Insert Coin (Level 0)
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    2 Posts


    -Sega screwed up too much
    -Marketing and brand recognition, Sony were big on a global scale
    -Nintendo went with carts and lost too much third party support. PS1 piracy got pretty common by the late 90s from what I've read
    -Which ended up mostly on team Sony - Square, Namco, Capcom, Konami, Ubisoft, etc. and Core and Naughty Dog ended up sticking with it
    -Gran Turismo
    -The demo discs were a pretty big deal too, these were traded around frequently where I lived and got people both playing various games in multiplayer and excited for the full releases
    -The pricing probably

    From my perspective, a lot of people were still playing SNES in the first couple of years, and PC gaming was getting big too after Doom. Some were obviously waiting for Mario 64, Star Fox 64 and Zelda (personally I was in my early teens and Mario didn't appeal to me at the time but I liked the other two a lot and occasionally played Golden Eye too). It really wasn't clear who was going to win until maybe late 1998 or 1999 over here. I got mine in late 1997 IIRC, which was a great time to get it thanks to FF7, RE2, Tomb Raider 2, GT, Oddworld, Tekken 2-3, etc., and more great games to come.
    Last edited by Alianger; 08-28-2021 at 05:43 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Fire Emblem: Path Of Radiance
    By ZP3 in forum Buying and Selling
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-13-2013, 04:29 PM
  2. WTB: Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance (GameCube) SEALED
    By [-Sentinel-] in forum Buying and Selling
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-30-2007, 01:27 PM
  3. The Matrix: Path of Neo
    By Oobgarm in forum Classic Gaming
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-11-2005, 07:04 AM
  4. A Couple More Doubles have Crossed my Path
    By SegaAges in forum Buying and Selling
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-18-2004, 04:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts