Hey, enough bashing. If people have good memories of their CD-I playtime, then let them be! Just because they didn't have the "hot" system everyone else had at the time doesn't mean they need to be ridiculed for it.
For instance, my first video game experience came from...an RCA Studio II.
Like the Philips CD-I, the Studio II was a video game system from a company that normally dealt in "regular" electronics. All RCA knew is that they wanted to be able to call themselves a tech leader; they didn't care how they got there.
Also like the CD-I, the Studio II was up-to-date and impressive for about three seconds after it was released -- then it immediately retreated to the bargain bins and was quickly forgotten by most people.
But not me.
Set the Way-Back Machine to 1985. Our neighbors had upgraded to an Atari long ago (I forget which, but it was probably a 2600) and were willing to give us their old system -- the Studio II. Being kids, and knowing that video games were damn cool (the other neighbor had an Intellivision), we immediately wanted it. The parents agreed, and we plugged her in.
I have great memories of playing Bowling, Baseball, Speedway and the Doodle program. Yes, they were in black-and-white. Yes, they sucked (in hindsight) when compared to other systems. But when that's all you have, you do your best to make the very most of it.
And I suspect the same is true for the CD-I. So while Joe or others may not be a fan of Space Ace or Burn:Cycle, don't worry if you have a healthy obsession with those titles.
I understand fully -- I've still got my Studio II.