the penguin game's objective kindof reminded me of a pinball table
I should add that there's probably someone out there who is right now hard at work creating a game involving turkeys, monkey butts, and power lines, as per Mr. Nerd's specifications.
"There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." --Bertrand Russel (attributed)
I have to say I enjoyed part 1 better than part 2. At times part 2 had good moments. Other times I felt that some stuff was forced. Oh well, it was entertainment and it was free.
Would you like to know more about collecting video games? Check out my extensive Youtube channel! https://www.youtube.com/user/swlovinist
well i'm glad someone else dislikes cybermorph and is haunted by the irritating green lady.
*looks around nervously*
although i know this forum has a legion of Cybermorph supporters from the bizzaro dimension.
Last edited by Soviet Conscript; 03-27-2009 at 01:26 AM.
you and your friends are dead GAME OVER
my classic console/computer blog
my GTZ feedback
my DP feedback
my Ebay feedback
my Neo-Geo forum feedback
Eh Part 1 was better. I agree with the Jaguar faults in actually working. Half the time I loaded up I got a red screen if every single cord/the game was not perfectly in place. (I even bought from a well respected member at Atari Age) Other than that I thought he could have used a few more actual game reviews for the system and a cd version review would have been nice (props for throwing down probably over 500 with shipping on the two cd units). I love the "after hooking up the other 47 cords that came with it" part lol.
Latest NFL News----->http://sxcamaro.wordpress.com/
my feedback: http://www.digitpress.com/forum/showthread.php?t=108202
you and your friends are dead GAME OVER
my classic console/computer blog
my GTZ feedback
my DP feedback
my Ebay feedback
my Neo-Geo forum feedback
I'm not sure why people hate Irate Gamer, I watch both AVGN and Irate Gamer as they're both alright. I do watch others too, there's plenty of good reviewers.
The whole angry reviews thing is getting a bit old actually, how many years can someone do the same act while keeping it fresh?
It's more than just someone, there's like 400+ people on youtube and other video sites that do the same thing, only plenty are terrible at it. As long as it's done somewhat creatively and it's enjoyable to watch it's ok with me, they're all funny in slightly different ways. Plus the more videos out there the better, one video every couple of weeks doesn't fill up too much time.
One problem I find is that people start bitching at other people on youtube who review games. I mean, if someone reviews a game that was reviewed by the AVGN (whether it be before or after the AVGNS review) The Fanboys come out and spam the comments with "you copied this from avgn etc etc, you sound just like, you are just ripping off bla bla bla"
I would do personally voiced game reviews if it werent for that.. Well, that and the fact that I sound very nasally and am insecure about my voice. .
DERP
That is true, plenty of people attack others for really no reason. How many TV shows out there are just ripoffs of others, nothing is really a new concept.
I'll post another good review from someone I watch, and isn't really that well known. It's an intersesting way to do a review(with no real budget anyway). He mostly reviews Commodore 64 games, which is different. This is an old review of his, I think he got a better camera afterwards.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWRFDPxomeI