link to the joystiq article:
http://www.joystiq.com/2008/06/02/eg...tations-cited/
I thought this was an interesting tidbit of info: Supposedly in EGM, the reviewers could not express their opinions about MGS4 in the June issue. This raises some questions that I have suspected, but What the heck? If game reviewers cannot be transparent about video games in their reviews, then why bother? I know that in the past there has been alot of pressure on mags and websites on what they can and cant say. Even though I am not a huge fan of EGM, I think that any publisher should have the right to say what they want about a game, and not be restricted on what they can personally say. If a game company threatens a game mag on what they can say or not say...that is utter pure crap. A game magazine should not have to worry about what they say about a video game from the company that makes the game...doesnt this defeat the purpose of doing game reviews?
I know that this is not a new issue, but with increasing pressure on a game to sell well with competition...do you think there is a limit on what right a game developer has to pressure a game magazine?
Personally if there a problem with a game, I think a magazine has every right to let the consumer know(before the game is relesased) the game has XXXX problem wrong with it.
I always have thoght of it strange when a major mag "waits" to do a highly anticipated review until the actual game is released several weeks...