Next time someone bashes games for being "old," make fun of them for watching movies that are "old." They at least have enough culture to watch movies from the 80s and 90s, right?
Next time someone bashes games for being "old," make fun of them for watching movies that are "old." They at least have enough culture to watch movies from the 80s and 90s, right?
Are we talking about new games or old games?
I mean lets not kid ourselves here, Contra on NES wasn't cheap when it came out, and its a 1 hour game. lol
and lots of old games had deceiving advertising..
The real thing you need to point out to kids is that the retro consoles paved the way for all the glittery polygons they are drooling over, and that back in the day, high res sprites were state of the art. Technology was being pushed to the limits even back then, and its stupid to compare them to 3D hardware based games in a negative way.
Though I guess you can't fully blamed the kids. They don't know what "hardware limitations" means, and have no idea what a sprite is, other than the pop.
Believe it or not, I'm 14 and I think Call of Duty is a bunch of bullshit. The sad part is is that I'm one of the small number of kids this generation who carries on the old things. I've been called a dumbass for saying I listen to casettes and for telling a seventh grader that he couldn't sell an NES with SMB/DH and Punch Out for $8000 just because someone sold one that had a SEALED COPY OF THE RAREST GAME FOR THE NES, and know what? I don't give a damn. They can continue their dumbass mistakes that screw their lives up in the long run, and I'll live a more sophisticated, fun one that'll leave me with a life to be proud of.
And I somehow spell better than most adults here. Weird.
Believe it or not, I'm 14 and I think Call of Duty is a bunch of bullshit. The sad part is is that I'm one of the small number of kids this generation who carries on the old things. I've been called a dumbass for saying I listen to casettes and for telling a seventh grader that he couldn't sell an NES with SMB/DH and Punch Out for $8000 just because someone sold one that had a SEALED COPY OF THE RAREST GAME FOR THE NES, and know what? I don't give a damn. They can continue their dumbass mistakes that screw their lives up in the long run, and I'll live a more sophisticated, fun one that'll leave me with a life to be proud of.
And I somehow spell better than most adults here. Weird.
shoot, i am a musician and have been using a digital recorder for years, a few months back it was ruined in a freak accident. recently i have found myself recording again onto my old 4 track cassette deck, and it sounds great!
has anybody mentioned VHS tapes? remember those giant video cameras you had to put on your shoulder that had a full sized VHS tape inside of them?
-- I was bradd on KLOV --
What freaks me out are the lush songs that were recorded on reel to reel 4 tracks that had a ton of layering. Sometimes using three 4s in tandem to get 8 tracks before needing to mix down to the third unit. On Bohemian Rhapsody, they ping ponged hundreds of vocal takes... Amazing, considering every little step they could have effed it up and had to retake it all... I worked with 4 tracks, cassette and reel. Now I use my computers. I never want to go back.
Last edited by Icarus Moonsight; 03-01-2010 at 01:57 AM.
This signature is dedicated to all those
cyberpunks who fight against injustice
and corruption every day of their lives
Im in the same boat as you although, as I am 19, soon to be 20, I have already travelled through the high school/teenager years appreciating the old things from days past and dealing with a lot of bullshit because of it. I have over a hundred cassettes, records, laserdiscs and a big collection of old videogames. Im glad to see younger people than I appreciating the past like this. Makes me not lose faith in the current generation of high-school goers.
I spend more time playing Super Nintendo than I do PlayStation 3. Period.
DERP
You're smarter than most kids/teens, probably smarter than most adults too. Just keep it up and you'll go far, those dumb kids will probably become dumb adults. There's plenty of adults like that, trust me.
Cassettes were around a lot longer than 1992, we kept buying them until they weren't carried in stores anymore. We didn't want to bother buying new CD players when we had lots of cassette players already. Cassettes were still around 10 years ago, though near death by that point.
That's what I had to use in high school for a project, that was only around 6-7 years ago.
That's because all three of those involve talking about conclusions exclusively. You can't really convince anyone in or out of those things, especially and never if they reached their conclusions outside of a method. At least, until they do adopt one or agree to discuss it in the frame of a method. You can't criticize conclusions to effect change in others really, just the method/process that generated it. If there is no method (found often in religion/politics) then you are left fighting air. Until you can introduce a method, it's pointless. Comes down to one saying, "I like vanilla." and the other saying, "You can't possibly... Because I like chocolate!" and the first saying, "Chocolate? What a moran..."
Last edited by Icarus Moonsight; 03-01-2010 at 02:58 AM.
This signature is dedicated to all those
cyberpunks who fight against injustice
and corruption every day of their lives
Two problems plague kids of that age:
1) They do not have fully developed brains. You can read about it here:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...ows/teenbrain/
I'm not calling them dumb, I'm just saying that later on they will be able to have "deeper thoughts" about things such as the video game industry.
2) They want to be considered cool. They don't want to be associated with something that is kidlike (mario, nes, etc.) because it can be socially damaging to them. Ragging on those kinds of things is also driven by the need to be cool. Like the first reason, this need will go away over time (for the most part).
My advice it to have a thick skin and ignore them. However, if given the opportunity, allow some of them to experience some of the old games at your house. Talk to them individually about it. If they are in a group, it's going to be harder to reach them.
My Youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/GamingTheSystems/featured
Yesterday I played Super Mario World with my 12 yr old son for a fair while. We started a new file and completed all 96 goals later into the evening. Of course a break was required to watch canada win the Olymic gold in hockey. He has a SNES in his room, and plays a lot of it. As we played Mario, he says dad we should play E.V.O. we haven't played that for a while. He loves a lot of classic games, however I don't think many of his friends do. Sometimes I think a lot of kids have not had enough exposure to the older stuff so that has a lot to do with their level of appreciation.
I don't really care, but it is really...sad to say the least. A completely immature, biased, unappreciative generation of teenagers are becoming next generations gamers. If this becomes widespread behavior, gaming will see its end in the hands of them. Remember, they are the next round of people to work in the industry. It makes me sad.
The people that can appreciate all 7 current generations of games are the ones who are the real gamers. They like EVERYTHING. They see the value in an 8-bit NES title, a hyper HD xbox 360 new release and the blip-bloops of Atari.
Were you even born when this was the case? Xbox, okay granted you were maybe five at the time, but Sony has been around the fringes since well before there was a NES, and Microsoft about as long as the NES.
No disrespect, but you are a kid; I'm still borderline one really. We can't escape the age we're born into, but only try to make it better.
There's no blanket issue wrong with today's games; if anything, you're much better off that I was in the 90s because of the choices you have available, and I theoretically was better off than kids who only grew up with Atari, and whatever. Game development didn't stop with the classics; I also think that there was a directness and emphasis on some good design that isn't a part of many of today's highly visible movie games, but for the most part the old games aren't gone. There's still cartridges, there's MAME, and there's lots and lots of freeware games and cheap direct download titles that simply didn't exist before.
Props for focusing your attention on something a lot of people think is merely "history," but there's no need to slag off today's games, I don't think.
That's just my half a cent's worth.
-----
Also, folks would be well to remember that people (successful people) don't write prose like Edgar Allan Poe or poetry like Walt Whitman; blackface isn't welcome in the movies anymore, etc. Old games probably fare better than some other artistic mediums because of how simple and direct they are - they speak across the decades clearly (at least the great ones do), but the state of the art has had to change as well. It's just how things go. Even if there's nothing wrong or offensive about old games, it's just not with the state of the art, which is guided by fads and marketing.
Last edited by Ed Oscuro; 03-01-2010 at 04:17 PM.