Some people actually do find the libraries of Sony systems very lacking, and so from their point of view the Sony consoles are realtively poor.

Is that outlandish, or is it just they way that I and others go overboard with Sony bashing as a (admittedly pointless) response to NIntendo bashing, etc.

I still feel that there is a double standard with regards to system bashing that pops up at times in threads.

As in, "Hi, let's make a thread just to trash the hell out of Nintendo and then be complete hypocrites as soon as someone reacts to our stuff in a similarly trashy manner."

Is it not possible for someone to just honestly feel a system doesn't have anywhere near what it takes to make it worth having?

And in all honesty, isn't it possible that there could be a point where a company treats theirs customers badly that even a dozen or so killer games aren't worth it.

The rationale under which a system can be bashed is this IMO:

1. There just aren't the games it needs to be worth a damn to the individual bashing it.

2. It hasn't already failed miserably, at which point it is possible to look carefully at it's library and acquire everything decent on it for a pittance.

IMO, there are a couple systems that fit the bill.

What systems fit the profile is up to the individual.

Some people just like to argue...... (guilty!)