Quote Originally Posted by Aussie2B View Post
I think the whole "nothing after the crash is 'classic'" argument only exists because gamers that are old enough that they were children/teenagers prior to the crash are highly nostalgic about the games they grew up with, so they look at everything that came later with some level of disdain.
I don't look at anything with disdain. I just said the NES is responsible for the comeback of gaming. My biggest collection is for the 3DO. My favorite system is the Playstation. I own all 3 current consoles and a DS and a PSP.

Quote Originally Posted by Aussie2B View Post
And the easiest way to reflect that is by denying everything else the term "classic", as if they're a lesser form of gaming.
Don't we have to draw the line somewhere? Or is every single game ever made going to become a classic, after say, 20 years? I just said the Playstation is my all time favorite system. Having said that, in my eyes, it will never be a classic system. It's not about greater and lesser, it's about classic or not classic.

Quote Originally Posted by Aussie2B View Post
Really, I think it's all silly. If this was still the 80s or even possibly the 90s, there might be some argument there, but when we're talking games that are all 25+ years old, is a difference of maybe 5 years at the most really night and day?
Yes it is, because there was a clearly defined period of time in the U.S. when there was no video gaming, as it had been dismissed as a fad. Why should it matter to me what was going on in Japan?

Quote Originally Posted by Aussie2B View Post
Is a 1982 launch Colecovision game that different from a 1983 launch Famicom game? One is "classic" and the other isn't?
Now who's being silly? Who in 1983 was playing a Famicom game in this country?

Quote Originally Posted by Aussie2B View Post
It's like looking at two elderly men, one 75 and the other 70, and saying "Man, that guy is old!" about the 75-year-old and "He's practically a baby!" about the 70-year-old.
Come up with all the analogies about old men and Guns n Roses you want. Look at any credible piece of literature about the history of gaming. You'll find that the NES is separated into a different era than the 2600, Intellivision, Colecovision, etc. Now if you feel the NES is a classic console, that's absolutely fine with me....although I disagree, I'm probably in the minority. But don't try this "the Famicom was released in Japan in 1983 so it's a contemporary of the Colecovision". It doesn't make sense, it has nothing or little to do with the U.S. gaming scene, and it's not even particularly relevant to this argument.