@ treismac: Again, my point is just that direct fed ROM support through some storage medium isn't necessary. I'm not totally against the idea. If they include it great; but if not I won't be heartbroken. It's just not something I think I'd use much even if it were present.

You want it though? Great. Unlike MyTurnToPlay, I won't crap over your opinion just because mine is different.

@ MachineGex: I agree. I normally have extreme tolerance and think most forums ban people more they they should, but this guy really does need to go.

@ wiggyx: I don't really think it's THAT ugly, but keep in mind it's just a prototype. Also keep in mind Hyperkin's other projects, like the Retorn3, have never exactly been the most visually pleasing devices to begin with. Even the way it is now, the Retorn5 looks better than anything Hyperkin has ever done.

@ Leo_A: Again, I merely don't think Hyperkin needs to do this to make their clone a resounding success. ROM support is a gray area, both legally and morally. If Hyperkin goes ahead with direct ROM feed support in addition to the cartridge support, it's not like I'm going to start complaining.

Just so there's no confusion, let me say it once again:

FOR ME PERSONALLY, the most important aspect is HD playback of the original cartridges. Direct ROM feed is something outside of that that I neither dislike or am against - I simply feel that it's not necessary given everything else Hyperkin has brought to the table with this design.