Major loophole. They said low capacity, as in seat-back airline in-flight entertainment use, cell phone, et cetera. Not only have I never heard of EITHER application (no cells capable of such emulation .. a CPU 2-4x as power as the GBA's ARM CPU is required to emulate it ..) but they left out *PCs*! What's less 'low-capacity' than a system thousands of times more powerful than the real deal? And which doesn't NEED to skip rendering frames?

Aren't Nintendo's nazi anti-piracy lawyers known for better than this? How could they miss something so OBVIOUS? [ I don't back Nintendo here and I am not angry at them for this little stunt. I just find their actions .. futile if they were going to go to the effort of PATENTING a flawed concept.. ]