That's not what I said at all, was it?
The fact that you choose not to recognize the very significant difference really has no bearing on the matter, if you're not capable of understanding how it's different, then you should probably stay out of the discussion. However, I'm sure that if you thought about it briefly rather than defending this stuff on reflex, you'd see pretty clearly what the difference is. And at the same time answer your own question of who's to draw the line.I'm afraid i just don't see the difference. The animal was bred to be slaughter, was slaughtered. This particular one was just purchased from the butcher before being cut up into proper meat cuts. I don't see it as being any different then buying a side of beed.
The fact it was used during a feast to promote GoW2 is completely irrelevant to me. I see it as no different then a family buying a goat for a themed party they were having.
There's no difference. That's an imaginary distinction people like to make sometimes if they still want to believe in ideals, but don't want other people's ideals to have to apply to them. Ethics and morals are the same thing. Or more specifically, ethics depends on morals for meaning.Also you're not talking ethics, you're talking morals. There's a big differnce and morals are very much unique to individuals and to groups.
...word is bondage...