Then don't be a Nintendo only gamer. Just because you're not fond of a certain company doesn't mean you have to miss out on the games because they're not coming to your preferred console. I think Nintendo is a piece of shit but I'll still buy their portables and consoles for the support that they do get.
Yes. The Gamecube didn't sell because of Sony fanboys. Resident Evil 4 didn't sell as well as Capcom liked, so it was ported. But Capcom released a lot of good games for the for both the Gamecube and GBA. Did Capcom support Nintendo as much as they supported Sony? No. Then again, neither GBA nor Gamecube were selling as good as the PS2 was. Capcom released Resident Evil, ports of 2, 3, Code Veronica, Resident Evil 4, Viewtiful Joe 2, Killer7, a ton of Mega Man games with two exclusives series for the GBA, and the Legend of Zelda Minish Cap was also Capcom developed. Other games were released as well, but the list I've made clearly shows Capcom's support for the Gamecube and GBA.We then get note of the Capcom5 (outside of the RE Dreamcast ports) and PN03 dropped, then RE4 was to be next as an exclusive. Two weeks prior with angry Sony fanboys shitting bricks they specifically write to Sony games NOT to buy a Gamecube, RE4 isn't exclusive, and come the following (Septemer I think it was) there would be the definitely FULL version on the PS2 with Ada Wong and some other crap.
Other than ports, remakes, and very few new releases, Capcom didn't support the PSP. There were a lot of games announced games for the PSP that never made it to fruition either. And then look at the Vita. Look at the massive amount of Capcom support there. A whole two games. Capcom even snubbed the Vita when making the announcement of porting Resident Evil Revelations. It didn't sell well on the 3DS and they list every other console aside from the Vita. The point I'm making is, they're not screwing over Nintendo fans. They go where they can get the most money. Like I said above. Buy a secondary console if you want a larger variety of games.
Online passes. They're only penalizing those that purchase used. If you purchase the game new then there's no issue. What are you really losing in 20 years by not having the online pass? Do you really think Battlefield 3 is going to be playable on the PS360 in 20 years when the online is no longer running? The only issue with the online pass is if you get Alice Madness Returns. In 20 years if you haven't already activated the pass and still have it on a hard drive, the first game isn't going to be playable.As far as Activision and EA goes, that's more of a general thing easily found online with their Online Passes, 'Origin' from EA, cannibalizing studio locations and talent to then fire most, close shop, and rape and pillage franchises. It just kind of depends what you're ok with and not. Snotty comments, selective releases, dumbed down frachise releases as rail shooters on Wii, etc.
Origin. EA wants to get into the digital business and sell their own games. EA makes a lot of games so why not capitalize by having people play EA games and possibly purchase other games on their Origin service? When Origin started and maybe they might still do this, but any EA game you've purchased with another digital carrier like Steam would be added to your Origin account when verified. There's only reason to bitch about Origin is if you're part of the EA hate train. You have to have Origin running in the background much like you do with Steam, and what's wrong with that? Oh. It's EA. Right.
But wait, there's more(EA hate.) Choo choo!! EA buys up developers and devours their very existence! Every company closes down developers. If the developer keeps making games that sell less than expected, you can expect them to be closed down. Sony shut down a lot of first party studios this year and last, Capcom has shut down multiple studios, even your precious Nintendo has shut down studios and fired people after their work was done. If you're going to blame anyone for the studio to go down in five or ten years because it's sold to another publisher, then blame owners of that development studio that sold it. There are reasons they're selling, and while there's always an amount of money that changes hands, it all depends on how large that amount of money is. THQ was losing money left and right so they had to sell all their studios. If the games that are developed by former THQ developers keep going in the red and the new publisher closes the studio, are you going to blame the publisher? Why should you? There's no sense in paying people to continuously lose money.
I'm surprised that first sentence is even there for reasons to not support EA and Activision. You're just riding the hate train with everyone else. Bitching about two developers for no reason. Atleast people who hate on Call of Duty have an actual reason(same game every year.) I don't like most of the games Activision develops, but I'll support them if they develop a game I'm interested in. On the other hand, EA has developed a lot of games this gen that I like and have mostly turned their company around. I'll support them as well. As long as they develop good games, doesn't matter who I support. I own quite a few first party 3DS, DS, and Wii games as well as Nintendo consoles and you already know my opinion of the company. I'll support them as long as they release good games. My opinion on the company doesn't matter. What I don't support are their sales tactics but that's nothing more than ideas put into use, not a game itself.
So all that crying and you finally have one legitimate reason, or atleast partially legitimate. Dumbed down rail shooter games? Eh. Close enough. If I was to purchase Black Ops, then I'd purchase it on the PS360 over the Wii. It's dumbed down, but again, have a secondary console if there are games that you might be interested to play that aren't on your console of choice, or if the version on your console of choice is graphically inferior(which would be obvious) to the HD console version. On the other hand, you mentioned "rail shooter" and by that I'm guessing you're talking about Dead Space Extraction. It might be a rail shooter, but this is a great game so you lose all credibility of your one legitimate reasoning behind hating on EA and Activision.
Woah, woah, woah! You said all this and Nintendo isn't on your list?I've got a small list of companies I refuse to buy product from so it's not just a gaming thing and it's not some political garbage or environmental thing, just anything from dirty pool, slimy tactics, or so mentally offensive ad campaigns I want nothing to do with the product/company. As others in here have said, you vote with your wallet and I do.