No we can't. Most of those "founding fathers" didn't really have storylines that served more purpose than framing the action. Some still don't. And as you said, other genres have storylines. Ninja Gaiden had a storyline. King's Quest had a storyline. Neither are RPGs.
......
And if I may go off on a tangent...
I'm seriously thinking that all our old genre titles need to be replaced. They're outmoded, outdated, and generally too vague. "RPG" Especially--as we've all noticed, the term is meaningless because you don't really "role play" (or, if you look at it from the opposite perspective, ALL games allow you to role-play).
In the place of old, outdated genre classifications, I propose the following:
A&E (Action and Exploration) = Legend of Zelda, Metroid, SOTN
Action = Super Mario Bros. Mega Man II, Ninja Gaiden
Collect n' Explore = King's Quest, Zork, Sam n' Max
Duel game = Street Fighter II, Tekken 4, Rise of the Robots
Pure Exploration = Myst and its clones (they lack an item collection/usage aspect and thus are different from Collect n' Explore)
Real Game = any game that simulates a real-world game. For example, sports, or Yu-Gi-Oh.
S&E (Statistics and Exploration) = Dragon Warrior, Wizardry, Lufia II
Whack 'em Sack 'em = Double Dragon, Final Fight, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles IV






Reply With Quote
