Zthun that's how it is looking. And then in the case of first doctrine being brought up, it looks like it probably could be violated. As the owner of the game you do not have the right to transfer ownership of it on your own, you can only go to specific location that have that MS Azure kit in play so they can de-register you, re-register the next guy and there will be fees of a notable percentage per game that go back to both MS and the publisher too. You won't be capable of using ebay, craigslist, newspaper, facebook groups, etc to peddle a game from person A to B as they won't have the kit.

Clearly it's why it seems companies like EA are giving up on their pay pass for 2nd owners of games because MS will handle it for them keeping the blood of their hands so they can point fingers at MS directly. Sneaky and effective as it kills the used game market except for authorized aftermarket peddlers. And given the fees involved don't even thing the not generous 15-25% you get usually on a game at Gamestop will continue, they'll have to lower the cut even further to pay for those fees going back to MS+publisher to keep their profit margins in line. With that I could see plenty getting upset when they have a $60 game, finish it in a month, and then take it to Gamestop and get $5-10 for it (formerly $20~) in the end. At that low of a return I know I'd just say screw it and keep things which is what they want all along.