And that invalidates my point.... how? Because we're going to kill them slowly we shouldn't respect them while they are still alive?
Oh please, spare me the propaganda. We've gone to war for just about anything except to thrown down a government that's leeching out it's own people.Of course, it has nothing to do with the governments of those countries.
http://www.christianaction.org.za/ne...ic_poverty.htm
If we truly wanted to end world hunger we could. We have the means we just lack the will (and there's no $'s to gain).
I never said that was causing bird flu. This is a fallacy. What I did say is that stuffing lots of birds in small cages stacked next to each other facilitates contamination.Bird flu has been around a little while longer than beak-searing.
http://www.avianinfluenza.org/bird-flu-origins.php
Ever wondered why for instance a flock of birds doesn't drop dead due to bird flu?Improving their quality of life wouldn't help us a bit. Keeping them from being fed bone meal might.
And it's already shown why that argument is bs1)The two are intertwined. I've already pointed this out earlier.
Hunting for 'sport', bull fighting, general animal cruelty and cruelty towards other members of our own species, wars, genocide,... I'd say we humans have a pretty bad track record. And that's all besides the point. We have the choice to treat life stock better but we don't because we don't care and we worship the $.2)Bot flies. Wasps that lay eggs inside of living spiders for the young to eat their way through their brains slowly. Equating the perversion of some humans to the entire species is no better than saying all Pit Bulls are bad dogs.
As a matter of fact, yes I've eaten wild game before as well as local cattle. Quality surpasses that what you'll find in a supermarket any day, not to mention the lack of steroids & antibiotics.3)Ever eat wild game before? Quality is crap, and the potential for human illness is higher.
This is the most cruel thing you can do to a cat. Either you get rid of the cat or you make damned sure your kid isn't left alone with your cat. Take some damned responsibility for once in your damned life.Own an aggressive cat and a small child at the same time. Bye-bye claws.
Mentioning starving kids is a fallacy. no matter we have free range chicken or not they'll still be starving. Lack of food isn't the reason why they're starving.Not more effecient. That's why free-range chicken costs a ton more. Again, when one says 'starving kids', it's part and parcel to this discussion.






Reply With Quote
